Dodging CORGI regs to fix oven?

Home Forums Trade Technical & Spare Parts Forums Trade Technical Enquiries Dodging CORGI regs to fix oven?

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #21359
    Martin
    Participant

    I know it’s been covered before here somewhere on UKW? But how do you go about replacing a fan motor on a dual fuel cooker when you ‘ain’t CORGI registered?

    Specifically I have a customer with a Cannon 10216G and the fan motor to the electric part of the oven is knacked and wants replacing. Now in order to access the fan motor, the back has to come off. And attached to the back is the main gas coupling to the hob. It’s a regular bayonet hose coupling to the supply right enough but on the back panel the gas pipes to the rings would need disconnecting first in order to clear the back panel away and get on with the job!

    Now am I digging myself a cesspit of liability poo if I tackle such a job I wonder? :rolls:

    I know how to do the job, it’s whether or not I should get my spanners out and see it through that I’m worried about? 😕

    The easy answer is to walk away from the job, but I’d would love to be advised on the official way to do it by someone that may know…. please?

    #190576
    kwatt
    Keymaster

    Re: Dodging CORGI regs to fix oven?

    Big grey area Martin to be blunt.

    In theory you can do this without being CORGI registered, but if there was a subsequent leak of gas (or most any other issue) then it’s the last man there that holds responsibility.

    Even the HSE and CORGI are not exactly clear on this subject.

    My advice would be not to touch it.

    K.

    #190577
    Martin
    Participant

    Re: Dodging CORGI regs to fix oven?

    kwatt wrote:My advice would be not to touch it.

    Hmmmmmm? I think you might be right there, very dodgy. 😕

    #190578
    expertcat
    Participant

    When i was at eac this question came up.
    The answer is ask the customer to disconnect qand reconnect the bayonet you are not then responsible for the gas supply and installation as long as you dont touch any gas joints.

    Its the same wierd regs as you can repair you own gas cooker but you are breaking the law if you repair your neighbours cooker.

    Technically you arnt allowed to fit a knob onto a valve as you would be directly operating a gas device.

    No doubt there are more conflicting regs with corgi buts it a grey issue if you are or not allowed to change an electrical part on a gas cooker.

    #190579
    wilf
    Participant

    Re: Dodging CORGI regs to fix oven?

    as I understand it you must NOT disconnect a gas unoin that requires tools to reconnect i.e. if you need a spanner to shift it DONT !

    wilf

    p.s. I wonder if some of those gorgi gas fitters either understand or carry out electrical safety tests if they were to fit said motor?

    #190580
    Martin
    Participant

    expertcat wrote:you are not then responsible for the gas supply and installation as long as you dont touch any gas joints.

    Since my first post on the subject I have delved deeper into the legal implications of undertaking such repairs (or any repairs that matter on gas appliances). The overwhelming conclusion I have assertained is as follows:-

    Unless you are an Corgi registered repairer/installer you must NOT under any circumstances attend or attempt to repair gas or duel fuel appliances. Even if it is a simple case of repairing a dodgy door hinge or sticking a couple of new control knobs on it!!!

    If in the unlikely event of anything going wrong and it can be proved that you were the last person on the scene. Then be prepaired for a lengthy court case followed by a spell at Her Majesty’s Pleasure Park….? 😥

    I have informed my customer of my decision and she will contact Cannon accordingly to get them to fix it. 😉

    #190581
    cookerfit
    Participant

    Re: Dodging CORGI regs to fix oven?

    The “correct” answer is in the Gas Regs from 1994 onwards. To undertake “work” on a gas appliance you must be defined as competent to do so. Only persons that have undertaken an ACS in a particular classification can prove competence and be listed by CORGI as competent.
    The action of disconnecting and reconnecting a bayonet is defined as a consumer action not covered by ACS or CORGI.

    As an non Corgi engineer working on a dual fuel appliance you could come unstuck many ways e.g. Public Liability insurance – not covered if it comes to the crunch as you have undertaken “work” on a gas appliance without proven competence.
    On top of the foregoing, where does it end – changing the ignition electrodes, ignition generators, indeed most of the work on a dual fuel range does not involve disturbing the gas pipework – but are you sure that the cooker is 100{e5d1b7155a01ef1f3b9c9968eaba33524ee81600d00d4be2b4d93ac2e58cec2d} safe when you leave it. Is the injector firing up the burner venturi correctly after removing and refitting the hob top and is the aeration correct?
    There are many similarities where gas pipework is not disturbed but would you consider changing a solenoid coil on a gas boiler without considering the risks to the client or your business. Even the action of changing a simple thermocouple can be hazardous as many pilots have atmospheric sensing built-in – fit the wrong T/C and they won’t work correctly and somebody could be overcome by CO.

    I don’t believe in CORGI as they are a money making enterprise and are not doing what they were originally set up to be but I do believe that anyone working on a gas appliance – whether its gas only or dual fuel should have at least the basic training and equipment to verify that the appliance is 100{e5d1b7155a01ef1f3b9c9968eaba33524ee81600d00d4be2b4d93ac2e58cec2d} safe after working on it. I’ve simply seen too many cock-ups to think or believe otherwise.

    Cookerfit.

    #190582
    Lawrence
    Participant

    Re: Dodging CORGI regs to fix oven?

    As Ken said this is a huge grey area I once asked Smeg service this question and was told that you can disconnect and re connect the bayonet fitting but not disturb a gas connection .
    I know someone else who asked a corgi inspector and was given the same response ,Yet I know of another person that asked another inspector the same question and was told no you cant disconnect the bayonet fitting but joe public can !.
    The whole gas situation with regard to the white goods industry is a farce in my opinion and rapidly needs to be seen to .
    How do we get corgi to see that the current criteria for training is un workable for most small companies ?

    Lawrence

    #190583
    kwatt
    Keymaster

    Re: Dodging CORGI regs to fix oven?

    The HSE are re-visiting the regulations now in conjunction with CORGI, NAPIT, Uncle Tom Cobbley and yours truly. A lovely day in London yesterday stuck listening to a lot of talk about it all then in a downpour when I eventually escaped. 😕

    The short of it is this…

    There’s been a study done, when I get a minute I’ll transcribe the press release, by University College London, which seems to indicate that there could be up to 23{e5d1b7155a01ef1f3b9c9968eaba33524ee81600d00d4be2b4d93ac2e58cec2d} of homes with a dicky gas appliance in it. Okay, no shock there when you see some of them and, also no shock, fires are the biggest culprit it would seem.

    BUT…

    You just knew there was going to be a “but” didn’t you… 😉

    7{e5d1b7155a01ef1f3b9c9968eaba33524ee81600d00d4be2b4d93ac2e58cec2d} of cookers were found to be dodgy as well on CO emissions, so looks like we’re going to get roped in on this one as well. Hence the reason I was there.

    Personally it is my view that until controls are put in place over who can or cannot buy gas fittings and spares then there’s no hope of ever stamping out unregistered traders and dodgy DIY’ers and that just wont’ happen. B&Q, Homebase, Wolseley and Gawd knows who else would be screaming from the raffters about unfairness. Not only that, as a chap from the DTI said, if they try to legislate on this (which is still an option) it has to clear the EU as well as the UK and not be anti-competitive.

    It’s massively complex.

    So the “government” will likely be asking manufacturers to employ a voluntary scheme in the meantime to restrict the supply of spares to gas competent persons only. The stick is that if the don’t do it, then legislation may well follow to ensure that it does happen.

    Have a nice day Rangemaster, GDHA, Hoover, Indesit etc. as it looks as if this will fly and, due to the press having a field day with about a quarter of Britain’s homes having a potentially lethal appliance in the house, I doubt you’ll have little option but to comply.

    Thing is I asked, who’s going to fix them?

    Now if that’s the short version you can imagine how much my head hurt last night. 😉

    How the re-hash of the registration scheme will go, I dunno frankly. But, on the upside, the word “streamlining” was the buzz word of the day in relation to that (amongst other things) and they are trying to make ACS accreditation easier. Of course I’m fighting our little corner, hopefully I got somewhere.

    K.

    #190584
    Lawrence
    Participant

    Re: Dodging CORGI regs to fix oven?

    kwatt wrote:
    How the re-hash of the registration scheme will go, I dunno frankly. But, on the upside, the word “streamlining” was the buzz word of the day in relation to that (amongst other things) and they are trying to make ACS accreditation easier. Of course I’m fighting our little corner, hopefully I got somewhere.
    K.

    Hurrah a voice in the desert of accreditation ,If they want to know exactly how difficult it is from the sharp end you have my number
    Lawrence

    #190585
    RocketMan
    Participant

    Re: Dodging CORGI regs to fix oven?

    Just in case anyone wants to have a go!!! I know it’snot a cooker or oven but same principle applies.

    http://tinyurl.com/qq7oc

    #190586
    kwatt
    Keymaster

    There’s more to that case actually.

    But nonetheless the point is, it’s simply not worth the risk.

    HSE has currently four cases on the go against illegal installers/repairers, they weren’t specific about who, what, where and when. But they are actively looking to crucify people.

    K.

    #190587
    eastlmark
    Moderator

    Re: Dodging CORGI regs to fix oven?

    Martin, does that cooker not have a ‘stamped out’ circular section behind the motor that can be removed without even taking the back off and then replaced with some self tappers? Much the same way as microwaves have under the turntable motors.
    Dont think I have ever come across a dual fuel cooker that even needs disconnecting at the bayonet (assuming the pipe is long enough) yet alone anywhere else, to change a fan motor.

    #190588
    Martin
    Participant

    Re: Dodging CORGI regs to fix oven?

    eastlmark wrote:Martin, does that cooker not have a ‘stamped out’ circular section behind the motor that can be removed without even taking the back off and then replaced with some self tappers?

    Indeed it does Mark you are quiet correct! 😉

    And the bayonet gas hose coupling it located poking through the false back of the adjacent cupboard. That would need disconnecting first. 😯

    I have declined the repair on safety grounds, I’m am not Corgi registered and my public liability insurance does NOT include work on gas appliances, period!

    cookerfit wrote:but are you sure that the cooker is 100{e5d1b7155a01ef1f3b9c9968eaba33524ee81600d00d4be2b4d93ac2e58cec2d} safe when you leave it. Is the injector firing up the burner venturi correctly after removing and refitting the hob top and is the aeration correct?

    Just sticking a new fan motor or an element does not necessarily mean having to touch the gas supply or pipework. But in so doing you then carry the full responsibility of the entire appliance and the implications that go with it! Corgi regulations even go beyond the appliance to include the room it stands in and the need to ensure adequate air vents and wall ventilation. All of which have to be inspected and given written certification.

    Furthermore it is my recommendation to others not to undertake work on gas appliances unless you are suitably qualified.

    I would also suggest that the ‘Advisory Council’ add an ‘exclusion clause’ within the terms of UKW Members Charter to legislate against those that would otherwise overlook such an important issue?

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.