Concerns

[kwatt]

Re: Concerns

kheath wrote:Seems as though I have upset someone with my post, so I have edited it to avoid further upset.

With immediate effect I have withdrawn from the Network project, all info and pm messages sent to me have been relayed onto Kwatt. Kenneth has all info on this project and I wish it huge success.

And that helps everyone how? I only just saw that.

So it says that we can’t agree internally and that you’ve thrown out the teddy.

Well done. You just killed it stone dead.

Now you’re not the only one considering resigning as I cannot work under conditions such as this with a loose cannon on deck.

K.

[Dave_Conway]

Re: Concerns

Kev, Ken and I agreed to remove your edited post from the subs forum tonight for what may or may not seem obvious reasons…

One being, I for one do not want to see you remove yourself from this project (or any other venture) and I don’t doubt Ken and Sean do either it just needs discussing further. I can’t quite grasp why the whole situation has got to this stage to be honest, ATEOTD we’re all mates and we can easily resolve sh1t like this.

I’ll think more on this tommorow as I’m fooked ATM …. 😉

Dave.

[kwatt]

Re: Concerns

After I’ve partially recovered from the shock of this, although I think I still have some reconcilliation to do…

You t-wat!

I suppose this means you’ll expect treated like royalty around here now. Well, it isn’t happening ’cause you’re still a t-wat!

But you’re our t-wat.

I will NOT under any circumstance, even these, let you off the hook by resigning as you’ve still got a power of work to do and don’t think for a minute that you’re getting out of it either.

I didn’t think it was greed, but I wanted to know the motives behind the changes and things you were doing, I had to press to find out what was going on. Now I know. I can’t say I’m happy with the outcome of that probing and, if I caused you or Bridie any embarrasment or distress I deeply apologise. I obviously didn’t and couldn’t have known the circumstances, or even have guessed.

The secret is safe per your wishes.

So, much though it pains me, I’m not going to let this stand in the way of what we’ve done or are going to do. We are going to do the network, it’s what you’ve wanted to do for over two years and we are going to do it right so that it will stand the test of time and you are, so far as I am concerned, going to massively help in setting that up just as you have done with everything else. As I said, you’re not getting out of anything.

I have to say I was a bit upset when I read this earlier, more so as it started to sink in, I still don’t think that it has fully sunk in. I was, am, totally unprepared to deal with not only the loss of someone that I work so closely with but a person that I have a massive respect for and consider an extremely close friend. More than that I can’t say as, right now, I’m a bit lost for words (which I know you may find hard to believe, but it’s true) and there’s no emoticon or expression that could relay how I feel right now. I need some time to get to grips with this.

So for the moment, probably just like you, from knowing you as well as I do, I’ll cling on in there and get on with it in the hope that the doctors are wrong and that, at the very least, you have more time with us.

K.

[Del]

Re: Concerns

We are all of us gutted by the bombshell of your post and as far as I’m concerned I’d just like to echo Ken’s feelings and request that you stay on board and help us to sort the network project out. That said, only you can decide how much you want to do, but know for a fact that your news in no way diminished our reliance upon the negociating skills, comittment, and concise strategic planning that we have on reflection far to often taken for granted.

I am not going to blow rainbows up your ar$e in fact this does not change my opinion that you are still a gobby twat. Just know that second in line after family we need you too. We’ve all come to far together for it to be any other way.

Sean

PS I did not type idiot I typed T-W-A-T

[kwatt]

Re: Concerns

Yes, t-wat comes out as idiot due to Dave and I I’m afraid, we went mental with the word filter over a drink of an evening.

I have to say I’m struggling with this. But I’ll get there and I’ll come up with some answers.

Regardless, we’ll prevail.

K.

[Dave_Conway]

Re: Concerns

I still haven’t recovered from the shock, it won’t quite sink in 😕

Needless to say, you have my full support and help if required, just ask.

Dave (rather lost for words).

[kwatt]

Re: Concerns

Okay I’ve pretty much done nothing bar think about this all weekend and it was bound to haunt me. I believe that was probably part of the motivation behind you not telling us Kev and it does change things, but I refuse to give up on you or what we do. I’m sure you probably expected that.

I also will make it my intent to ensure that we can do as much as we possibly can, both privately and in business, to ensure that you and your family are as taken care of and considered as much as is humanly possible by us. I value friendship and loyalty above almost all other considerations, but you knew that.

I’ve left it alone as much as I can, my post last night or in the wee small hours, was me sat here considering and strategising as well as getting a little drunk. In the end I came to the conclusion that, whilst we could dwell on this and become morose, there’s little point in doing so. It certainly won’t serve you for us to do so.

So we need to get on with it.

We’ll talk tomorrow.

K.

[admin]

Re: Concerns

Ken, re your post in the subs forum, topic the network.

Please do not post about you and I and the network. I have said several times to you that I don’t want any part of it, you may post differently, but the fact is, as I have stated. Dave and you may have made an executive decision to remove my earlier post, but it doesn’t change my opinion.

Whilst I’m happy to assist, I actually don’t think what you propose can ever work, therefore please refrain from mentioning my name in your replies, thanks.

Kevin

[kwatt]

Beyond the first paragraph there’s no mention made of any involvement by you, simply a “we” without specifying who exactly. I cannot do much about what people read into it or assume from it which will probably be that you are involved as you have been with most everything ever done.

There is also no mention of the method that will be used. the post is deliberately vague but was designed to put an end to the questions that were asked about your post that was edited then disappeared. This is the only reason that the mention is there in para 1.

But it’s really there to throw them off the scent and not to assume that anything is cast in stone just yet. There was no intention to imply anything else and I’d had a vodka or two at that time of night so probably was prattling a bit as usual.

K.

[Author]

Posts