The implementation of an environmental recycling charge (ERC) is supported by a number of industry associations, according to reports.
The current argument regarding costs is based on the requirement, set out in the WEEE directive, that all producers and suppliers must take responsibility for recycling electrical goods.
However, industry figures are questioning how this recycling is going to be paid for, with many concerned about the imbedding of hidden costs.
Bringing in ERCs would offer an upfront cost, added to all new items, that the consumer would pay to cover the cost of recycling their old product.
Uwe Halleck, chairman of the Association of Manufacturers of Domestic Appliances (AMDEA) told edie.net: “This is not about making money, this is about ensuring that we create a better environment for everybody.
“We believe ERC is the only way that the cost of historic waste can be shared amongst those who have benefited from its sale and this view is supported by the overwhelming majority of manufacturers.”
Nonetheless, consumers are likely to feel cheated by such a development, with some people concerned that they will be charged even if they’re planning on reusing their old TV.
Measures are likely to be attached to any ERC that allows consumers to only pay the charge when the recycling service is actually being used.
From TUV
