Advisory Council defining it’s roll and members

[kwatt]

Re: Advisory Council defining it’s roll and members

More detail would be required, and publication of those details, should the need arise to take any action over a member’s behaviour. That is where the documentation comes into it and we have to be 100{e5d1b7155a01ef1f3b9c9968eaba33524ee81600d00d4be2b4d93ac2e58cec2d} right on it as well, with the dates and everything.

So in a scenario where Joe Repairs screws it up and does not respond to any prodding by the AC, wherever possible you’d try to assign another repairer obviously, and then go on to detail why you’ve booted him off Repairs@ in detail.

It serves many purposes, the foremost is that you are seen to be acting properly and correctly as well as within the rules and scope of the AC. The second is, with the first instance when/if it happens, that it is seen to work and follow a logical system. Fairness and every opportunity to resolve the issue was given to the repairer or customer.

K.

[Del]

Re: Advisory Council defining it’s roll and members

Who was it taught me about little duck’s being all in a row 😆
We are not going to tell the whole thing on one page, what we are working on first is a basic introduction to try to give them the who, what , and why.

The latest draft gives them the who, what, & why bit and the where & when bit will look after it’s self when we have a presence in the open forums.

Then under seperate headings we will post the remainder (see below) after we have discussed, debated, concluded and drafted them all and sorted them out

1 st. rules

2 nd. sanctions

3 rd. proceedures

let’s finnish the intro first and then we can put it to bed and move on to rules.

Sean

[Author]

Posts