Home › Forums › UK Whitegoods › Moderator/Site Admin Forum › “Ooooh Matron” ?
- This topic has 1,521 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 20 years, 2 months ago by
iadom.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 3, 2007 at 7:57 pm #165193
kwatt
KeymasterYep, just read it.
What he totally fails to appreciate is that I’m not worried about him at all, he can go fry himself crispy if he likes and that’s not my problem. My problem is the monkey that tries it “because he read it on t’internet” and accepted it as a hard factual and recommended fix, which of course it isn’t
The expression, “MAD Scientist” springs to mind. Whilst perhaps admirable, maybe even ingenious, it’s not a solution that I’d recommend to any old sod off the street.
K.
April 4, 2007 at 5:39 pm #165194gegsy
ParticipantRe: QED ?
Had a PM of helo_75, see below
From: helo_75
To: gegsy
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 4:41 pm
Subject: Re: Nasty emailhi mate..
sorry to bother you, but im still gettin crap off mike in horwichaparantly im childish, insecure , selfish arrogant, and trying to deny him the right to modify his f/f
sheesh, is there any way i could block him?
Have PMd back
From: gegsy
To: helo_75
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 6:33 pm
Subject: Re: Nasty emailHi
You are not bothering me at all.
I will have to involve site admin at this time as intimidation from ANY user of the site is not allowed.
They have the ultimate decision.
As for blocking him, if you go into a forum where he has posted, there is an ignore button.Hang in there
Greg
I will leave mike to you Ken 👿
Greg
April 4, 2007 at 5:44 pm #165195kwatt
KeymasterHe’ll back off once he cools down.
K.
April 4, 2007 at 5:55 pm #165196gegsy
ParticipantRe: QED ?
Had reply back
helo_75 wrote:ur a gent thanx
i dont feel i have to apologise to him for tryin to make sure people conduct themselves safely
ill just ignore him, but id prefer it if he just left me alone!
Just for your info
Greg
April 4, 2007 at 7:05 pm #165197kwatt
KeymasterYou get this a lot on the net, attention seekers just looking for a fight really. Best treated like petulant children mostly. 😉
K.
April 4, 2007 at 9:33 pm #165198iadom
ModeratorRe: QED ?
Keyboard Terrorists, now who did I hear described thus a long while back. 😉 😆
Jim.
April 4, 2007 at 10:00 pm #165199kwatt
KeymasterYeah, only I’m good at it. 😉
K.
April 4, 2007 at 10:41 pm #165200iadom
ModeratorRe: QED ?
Twas not you, but it may have been one of our merry band. 😉
jim.
April 5, 2007 at 2:20 pm #165201iadom
ModeratorRe: QED ?
I have just ‘unstuck’ a post by brett1611 in the Trade Tech forum, I don’t have a problem with people bumping a post if they don’t get an answer but to post a tech question as a Sticky is surely not the done thing. I haven’t told him what I have done, just hoping he gets the message. 🙂
Jim.
April 5, 2007 at 2:24 pm #165202kwatt
KeymasterAgreed I’ve done a few of those as well. 😕
K.
April 6, 2007 at 3:03 pm #165203iadom
ModeratorRe: QED ?
Just deleted a post from Mike in Horwich, in the Public Refrigeration forum, seems he may have been trying to slip it in over the Bank Holiday trying to stir things up.
This is the guts of his post.
…………………………………………………………..
Quote:
Inbox :: Message
From: helo_75
To: Mike-in-Horwich
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 3:40 pm
Subject: Re: Just what IS your problemjust go away dickhead
Unquote.
—–
Could you be more specific Helo_75, in the open forum ?
Opinion may be split as to my choosing to post your PM, Helo. As you know, my PM’s were polite and only sought to ask you “what really is your problem?”.You’re responses have culminated in the crass, childish PM above.
You do yourself and this site no service.
………………………………………………………………
Helo_75 can be a little ‘forthright’ to say the least but PM’s should stay private. I think a word in Mike in Horwichs ear from Admin may be needed.
Jim.
April 6, 2007 at 3:36 pm #165204kwatt
KeymasterLooking that way, let’s see what he does nxt if anything. If he’s really pissed it’s not hard to find an email addy for admin.
K.
April 6, 2007 at 8:56 pm #165205Penguin45
ParticipantRe: QED ?
I did suggest to Helo that if was still getting grief off that tw@t, he forwarded them to Admin@ and replied the same to M-inH. He picked up the PM, but hasn’t acknowledged it. It worked for me – I haven’t heard from M-in-H since the email I forwarded to Ken.
Point of order Mr Chairman – isn’t the unauthorised publication of a PM a breach of protocols? PMs are just that – Private messages.
Chris.
April 6, 2007 at 8:59 pm #165206kwatt
KeymasterYes, correct a PM is a PM unless made public with permission. To post without that is bad form indeed.
K.
April 6, 2007 at 11:04 pm #165207Penguin45
ParticipantRe: QED ?
Haven’t read “Censorship” yet, but have just replied to an email from M-in-H, which should go plop in the admin@ inbox any moment now………
Chris.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
