- This topic has 1,521 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 20 years, 1 month ago by
.
-
Posts
-
No my brother isn’t intelligent enough to construct that sort of a trolling. 😉
However I do wonder if this is the old engineer fella back again for another round. unn.ac.uk email address, so a lecturer or summat but with little common sense in any event.
K.
Re: QED ?
I didn’t think for one minute jjames was dwatt, I was just amazed that he appeared here only a day after I asked you about him. 😯
Jim.
I just sussed, too annoyed by the other tw4t. 😕
Oh hell knows what he’s up to but if he steps out of line just delete with no mercy. 😉
K.
Re: QED ?
blaster has posted WIDL error codes in public forums, we all know they are out there for anyone who can use Google, do we want them on public display on UKWG’s ?
Jim.
Re: QED ?
He’s obviously gotten them from somewhere and, as is the nature of the internet, you cannot keep a good secret down whether it is true or not. However, the fact is that we did not publish the codes, a member of the public without access to the trade section has and that indemnifies us thanks very much.
So, I’d have to say leave it as is. If we censor we’re damned and, if we don’t, we’re damned. Hobson’s Choice yet again I’m afraid but leaving it there is erring on the side of caution and, should The Indesit Company ask us to remove it we will make a big play of defending it and if push comes to shove we’ll remove it. Either way, win.
In the end though you still need to work it out. 😉
K.
Re: QED ?
That thread would have been so much shorter and not contain the error code list had the original post info been picked up on….
blaster wrote:its only 10 months old by the way
Don’t touch it then blaster and phone Indesit straight away…..end of!
Re: QED ?
iadom wrote:Perhaps you should start answering posts in the public forum again then
Perhaps I’d best eh? 😉
Re: QED ?
I say, chaps – that was a bit uncivillised……..
http://www.ukwhitegoods.co.uk/modules.p … ic&t=15273Commendable self-restraint, Ken.
Chris.
Re: QED ?
Penguin45 wrote:Commendable self-restraint, Ken.
Believe me, if you’d seen what I started to post back at the tw@t… 😆
It just wasn’t on and whoever it was beat a hasty retreat and I have to assume that the message was received and understood.
K.
Re: QED ?
Call me paranoid (shut it) but why would someone single out Chris 😕
and why have all the full mooners come out to play this week ❓Greg
Re: QED ?
gegsy wrote:why would someone single out Chris 😕
‘Cos it seems to be me that answers all the SMEG/Diplomat d/w queries and there’s only so many answers to a limited number of questions if we try and stick, even loosely, to the “Rules”.
I should point out that there are other members and even moderators who are perfectly capable of answering the questions but choose not to.
Chris.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.