Home › Forums › Public Support Forums › Help And Support › Cooker And Oven Forum › Range cookers are they a waste of time?
- This topic has 4 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 9 months ago by
ClaireHi.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 17, 2009 at 2:08 pm #47155
ClaireHi
ParticipantHi all
new poster/sometime lurker here, just wanted to canvass opinion on range cookers.
I recently purchased a rangemaster toledo 90, as I read on these forums that rangemaster are the best of the bunch in this price range. it has not yet been connected but looks very nice!
having mentioned this recommendation on another forum, a couple of kitchen suppliers have chipped in that they think rangemaster is no better than any other make and that none of the ranges at this price point are any good.
what do you folks reckon? should I sell my kids and buy a Lacanche instead?
July 17, 2009 at 2:16 pm #292494kwatt
KeymasterRe: Range cookers are they a waste of time?
Hi Claire,
Like hi-fi and many other things it is a law of diminishing returns in many ways with appliances.
You get three basic price bands that they all, pretty much, play to…
Cheap, basic
Medium, generally fairly okay
Top end, great machines but they come at a price
IMO Rangemaster is okay, personally I prefer the Falcon and Mercury cookers although they are a bit more expensive but it’s horses for courses. I’d say they were all pitched at the upper end of the “medium” sector. That is to say that they are pretty well built, perform well and as most people would expect but don’t expect something hewn from stone or professional class cooking.
Once you jump up into that Lacanche, Viking and so on territory you’re into serious money, serious performance and seriously well built kit, as a general rule. But, you pay for all that.
Anything sub-£1000 in terms of a range cooker I’m very suspect about in terms of build and performance as, trust me, there’s more than a few out there that are, shall we say, not very good.
HTH
K.
July 17, 2009 at 2:34 pm #292495ClaireHi
ParticipantRe: Range cookers are they a waste of time?
thanks for the quick and helpful response.
I have been told very specifically that my rangemaster will only last 5 years, do you think this is realistic or scare mongering?
July 17, 2009 at 2:44 pm #292496kwatt
KeymasterScare mongering I expect. :rolls:
I’d expect to get 8-10 years out it, maybe longer, unless you really give it a lot of use.
K.
July 17, 2009 at 2:53 pm #292497ClaireHi
ParticipantRe: Range cookers are they a waste of time?
thanks for that!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
