Red tape gone mad!

Home Forums General Trade Forum Red tape gone mad!

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #89473
    bagman
    Participant

    Was asked by a serviced office company if we repaired dishwashers, after a few back and forward emails (why don’t they just ring?), they asked me to do the repairs.. oh and before I do can I supply the following information:

    Employers Liability

    Public Liability

    H & S Policy

    References

    Certificate of competency (WTF?)

    Method Statement (again, WTF?)

    Risk assessment

    Plus all my bank details.

    All for a probable one of sub £100 repair.
    What the hell is wrong with these people?

    #441477
    kwatt
    Keymaster

    Re: Red tape gone mad!

    I know what I’d tell them to do with the job. 😉

    K.

    #441478
    bagman
    Participant

    Re: Red tape gone mad!

    kwatt wrote:I know what I’d tell them to do with the job. 😉

    K.


    I did, but very politely… never burn bridges unless I have to 😉

    #441479
    admin
    Keymaster

    Re: Red tape gone mad!

    I did, but very politely… never burn bridges unless I have to 😉

    I just pour a couple of gallons of aviation fuel over it.

    Bryan

    #441480
    Andy jones
    Participant

    Re: Red tape gone mad!

    Had a exactly the same with a solicitors office

    #441481
    stratfordgirl
    Participant

    Re: Red tape gone mad!

    On a similar vein, one customer today, after inviting me in, his first question was, “Oh, can I just check, do you have public liability insurance?” I am not sure whether I should be worried by that. Maybe it was just his way of trying to make sure I took care not to damage anything, perhaps as he has had a bad experience in the past.

    #441482
    wilf
    Participant

    Re: Red tape gone mad!

    “There you go all fixed”
    “Oh good……. what you want paying? …. what now?”
    Cue three months later seven or eight emails phone calls invoice re submissions
    you start to ask how desperate you are for work to play such sill games.

    wilf

    #441483
    smeghead
    Participant

    Re: Red tape gone mad!

    Yes , I have been asked for those details too for some company who’s name I don’t recall.
    Declined job anyway.
    I now only work for Joe public, no business’s , no corporations .
    Am very choosy with landlords as well, get a deposit up front .
    Estate agents are the worse, so told them where to go too -(politely)
    Red tape, I can’t be doin’ with it anymore.
    Clive

    #441484
    squadman
    Participant

    Re: Red tape gone mad!

    We have had this several times, only last week a local company brought a Numatic Henry for repair to our premises. We accepted in, traced the fault and then phoned the company with an estimate, they wanted a email address to they said to said over order. What followed was a four page questionaire including a full Risk Assesment, which bearing in mind this work was being done on our premises, if we had had any insurance claims in the last three years, in Fact it would have taken a considerable period of time to complete this all for a low cost repair.

    The upshot was that we told them to come and collect it as we were not prepared to complete their forms. its Red Tape, Imagine if having served these forms on us that we then served the same on them. Nothing would ever get done !

    #441485
    timdowning
    Participant

    Re: Red tape gone mad!

    Things would get done but at an increased price for everyone in the equation. Who pays for that, Joe public.
    Mad world.

    #441486
    squadman
    Participant

    Re: Red tape gone mad!

    As in this case nothing got done and they still have been unable to get the product repaired aa no small business would be able to meet their criteria.

    #441487
    timdowning
    Participant

    Re: Red tape gone mad!

    The end result is they buy a new product.
    More oil used.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.