[ibcus]

Re: Flame Failure Device

You don’t need to but you just did.

You have to prove you are worth something don’t you.

If I was an owner I would reconsider that decision after the things you have posted on here, you are a nasty little man with an awful attitude of superiority.

[ibcus]

Re: Flame Failure Device

There you go again, bringing down the tone.

How you ever got to become a moderator is beyond belief.

Thanks for giving me the chance to stop posting in my own thread by the way.

You are showing your true colours to everyone, they know exactly what you are now.

[ibcus]

Re: Flame Failure Device

Wow, you actually do have low self esteem, that was a complete guess, honest.

I must admit though, it’s always a sign when someone ends their post with their username, just to make it clear that the gems of wisdom above it did actually come from them.

I’m amazed it doesn’t end with

Regards,
Jackal.

I bet you’ve thought about it haven’t you?

Anyway that is by the by .

I’m glad you’re feeling a little better about yourself now and, more to the point, you feel important once again.

[ibcus]

Re: Flame Failure Device

So let me get this straight.

I’m stupid and an idiot for reading the rule than making the post.

You are a moderator that is supposed to enforce said rule but are exceedingly clever for giving advice to my post?

I think I know what the problem is, it’s a lack of self esteem isn’t it?

Well, here you go Carl.

You were right and I was wrong.
You are very clever and I am very stupid.
You are far superior in every way than I.
Your knowledge knows no bounds, you are a great guy, an all round good egg.

There, you can sleep soundly now tonight in the warm thought that you are you.

[ibcus]

Re: Flame Failure Device

You can always tell when someone is clutching at straws when they start to insult you.

[ibcus]

Re: Flame Failure Device

Going by your reasoning you are stupid and an idiot for posting advice to me, Jackal.

Jesus christ, I feel like in the Minority Report.

I’m dangerous for thinking something.

[ibcus]

Re: Flame Failure Device

Arguing?

Are you for real?

Yes I did read the rules and I did get the help I was looking for, not to do it.
That was sorted out way before you set off on your vendetta.

I can’t help but think about living next door to you and dragging an old cooker into the back garden to ‘so some work on’, just to watch you go red in the face and jump up and down waving your arms, and more than likely stamp your feet.

I’ll tell you what, I’ll say a penance to the god of natural gas for even thinking about touching something concerning it.

God knows what I would have to do if I actually did it, explode in a fireball taking my nearest and dearest with me and anyone that said anything against you I guess, if you had your anal way.

[ibcus]

Re: Flame Failure Device

Jackal wrote:

ibcus wrote:
I bet you’re a barrel of laughs in the canteen.

We dont have a canteen, my staff prefer other, better quality establishments than your obviously used to and those that know me on here know my humour.

So says the all knowing you.

Jackal wrote:

ibcus wrote:
What exactly did I carry on with?

Trying to find out how to get your original question answered, despite several of us advising otherwise and not letting go of it when you realise your in the wrong.

I seem to recall that I did let go if it, it seems to be you that won’t let it drop.
Like a dog with a bone.

Jackal wrote:

ibcus wrote:
Do I care if you believe me or not?

Strangely, no, I don’t.

If you already knew the answer then why ask the question, sorry but you seem to have a habit of that when the answer doesn’t you or your requirements, silly me I forgot that.

Drivel.

Jackal wrote:

ibcus wrote:
I’m pretty glad I don’t live next door to you to be honest.

That really is mutual and to be honest I feel a whole lot safer as a result!

I’m sure you do.

Jackal wrote:

ibcus wrote:
What argument did I try to engage in, I would love to know.

It is so blindingly obvious I would explain it all to you but your clearly too thick to understand, as your demonstrating now, and it would end up being years of my life I wouldn’t get back.

Um, ok then.

Jackal wrote:

ibcus wrote:
You really are a bloody minded so and so, wanting more people to get blown up now.

Yes I am bloody minded about safety and I make no bones about it and I don’t want more people blown up, just those close to you, if your stupid enough to ignore the advice given.

I now wait for your next round or pathetic excuses for your existence and continuing of this topic.

Jackal

Do you know how pathetic that sounds?
I seem to recall something similar in a film or two, I want him dead, I want his wife dead, I want his mothers sisters half brother twice removed dead.

What you seem not to be able to get into your thick blinkered head is the fact that I haven’t done it, yet you are still harping on about it as though I have.

Jackal wrote:
this unqualified, inexperienced cowboy of a guy, playing with and attempting to bypass the safety devices on his gas unit.

[ibcus]

Re: Flame Failure Device

I bet you’re a barrel of laughs in the canteen.

What exactly did I carry on with?

Do I care if you believe me or not?

Strangely, no, I don’t.

I’m pretty glad I don’t live next door to you to be honest.

What argument did I try to engage in, I would love to know.

You really are a bloody minded so and so, wanting more people to get blown up now.

[ibcus]

Re: Flame Failure Device

Jackal wrote:
Unless we agree he is right and on that basis advise the OP on how to do what he wants to achieve, he clearly isnt interested.

Let him do it his way, he clearly knows better than us whom spend thousands on the training and certification, not to mention the years gaining the experience to be safe in the industry.

You clearly haven’t read all my posts, have you?
Or are you just cherry picking so you can get some of that chip off your shoulder?

ibcus wrote:I do understand what you are saying kwatt and I do understand that gas is very dangerous.

Taking a part out of the FFD is not looking as good as I first thought, although I am sure it will work there is a far greater chance that it could leak.

I will wait until I have the correct part and get someone to fit it.

Jackal wrote:
All we can hope for is its his family being blown up and killed rather than somebody else

Wow, just wow.
You really are not a very nice person, are you.
You would want it take out my whole family and not just me?
Now that would be teaching me a lesson, wouldn’t it?

Jackal wrote:
Some people just don’t want to listen, the OP is one of them. We have better things to do and can help people whom really want the help.

I refer you to my previous post that you either failed to read or just completely ignored so you could rant on.
I’ve even put it in bold and colour so you can see it more clearly.

ibcus wrote:I will wait until I have the correct part and get someone to fit it.

It would seem your ‘thousands on the training and certification’ didn’t teach you to read everything before jumping in with both feet.

[ibcus]

Re: Flame Failure Device

captaincaveman1 wrote:

ibcus wrote:

The cooker is at the moment not connected to the gas supply.

The pipe going to the oven is just hanging loose as the FFd and oven jets have been removed.

.
Your above post prove’s you dont know the slightest thing about the reg’s for example under no circumstances must a gas pipe be left open unattended for a start. It really doe’s p me off that I have to go to the trouble of having to be gas safe every five years when people like yourself think its all just b0ll0cks and so have a go themselves risking family and nieghbours just to save £50-£80 pound but think nothing about spending thousands on a new car for example 😡 .

It p’s me off when people think they should spout an answer out when they haven’t even read a post completely

[ibcus]

Re: Flame Failure Device

I haven’t done any test on the cooker, i don’t have the equipment to test it.

I can only assume it is working fine, otherwise gas would have been leaking from it until I disconnected it today, and the guy that serviced the central heating 2 months back would (should) have noticed a drop in pressure.

[ibcus]

Re: Flame Failure Device

Ok, let me rephrase that.

What i was talking about fitting (FFD) would surely only have gas going to it when the oven is actually turned on, so saying the kitchen could have any amount of gas in it over night is a bit over the top, or blatantly wrong.

I fail to see how gas can leek out of something that has no gas going to it.

You may want to read the last part of my previous post as well.

[ibcus]

Re: Flame Failure Device

I do understand what you are saying kwatt and I do understand that gas is very dangerous.

Although the articles you posted, 2 are the exact same event and that was an old guy that simply left his cooker on when not lit, the last one was a guy actually fitting something to the mains supply.

What i was talking about fitting would surely only have gas going to it when the oven is actually turned on, so saying the kitchen could fill with gas over night is a bit over the top.

Taking a part out of the FFD is not looking as good as I first thought, although I am sure it will work there is a far greater chance that it could leak.

The cooker is at the moment not connected to the gas supply.

The pipe going to the oven is just hanging loose as the FFd and oven jets have been removed.

I’m sure it should be safe to connect the cooker back up to use the hob burners and grill with the pipe just hanging open, as long as the oven is not used, I will remove the knob so it isn’t turned on by accident.

I will wait until I have the correct part and get somone to fit it.

[ibcus]

Re: Flame Failure Device

How long have ovens been fitted with FFD’s?

Did they explode regularly before they fitted them?

[Author]

Posts