Home › Forums › UK Whitegoods › Moderator/Site Admin Forum › “Ooooh Matron” ?
- This topic has 1,521 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 20 years, 2 months ago by
iadom.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 20, 2007 at 4:44 pm #165073
johnmac11
ParticipantRe: QED ?
iadom wrote:Changed about a month ago at least, twas not me, even though I started it. 😥 8)
Jim.
I could have sworn it was the “bending of light” title this morning but then again I am getting old now. 😆
John
February 20, 2007 at 4:45 pm #165074gegsy
ParticipantRe: QED ?
Yea it was 😆
Greg
February 20, 2007 at 4:55 pm #165075Martin
ParticipantRe: QED ?
Twas me…..guilty….I confess! 8)
Has a simply ring to it, don’t you think….QED?
February 20, 2007 at 5:21 pm #165076iadom
ModeratorRe: QED ?
Well maybe, but what if anything has been proven 😕
Jim.
February 20, 2007 at 5:27 pm #165077gegsy
ParticipantRe: QED ?
iadom wrote:Well maybe, but what if anything has been proven 😕
Erm
Caution: Product may contain nuts
:snigger:
Greg
February 20, 2007 at 5:31 pm #165078iadom
ModeratorRe: QED ?
gegsy wrote:
Caution: Product may contain nuts
QED 8)
February 21, 2007 at 10:51 pm #165079iadom
ModeratorRe: QED ?
Well, indespoint has risen to the bait, 😉 and sent me this PM. seems to think a lot of people agree with him.
……………………………………………..
from indespoint
It seems you have got it wrong. I dont have a few years in the trade. I have a few years for indesit yes but didnt just work for them. It also seems that there are quite a few people using this site who tend to agree with me judging by the private messages I have recieved. Most stating the same thing about moderators. I have entered replies to quite a few technical quieries on here and have had moderators sticking in their opinions where it is not needed. Mainly in the form of bitchy slagging off comments. The aim i thought of this site was to help others either in the trade or members of the public not to assert your own judgements or inconsistancies in replies. ie on giving a reply being told by a moderator that you cant give that information out. maybe its professional jealousy on your part that makes you the way you are. IADOM IT ALL DEPENDS ON ME. How apt
For the record I have 27 years experience in engineering be it in the RAF or as an engineer working on white goods.
………………………………………………………Until my access to the Merloni FSE forum was curtailed due to my mole, a recently retired Hotpoint engineer having his access temporarily removed due to his constant support for industrial action I have not seen anything from there. Safe to say, when I did, indespoint was one of the more outspoken posters who seemed to get up the nose of one or two others. In fact the last time I was allowed access, many months ago, there were only a handful of regular posters from a field force supposed to be in the high hundreds or more. :rolls:
I don’t think I will reply to this PM just yet, I will keep my powder dry for the moment.
Jim.
February 21, 2007 at 11:12 pm #165080kwatt
KeymasterRe: QED ?
Uh huh.
So there’s a conspiracy by the mods against Indesit. Shock, horror, surprise… NOT!
However that’s not really the point, the point is that I often get the old “based on the PM’s I get” thing when there’s no substance to the claim ever made, evidence to support the opinion of the person making that claim or even any real public opinion. My answer is pretty much always the same…
Put up, or shut up.
If people have an opinion we have this amazing thing known as a “forum” to voice that opinion. If they don’t then tough titty, they lose the ability to offer an opinion if they choose to gag themselves.
Just IMO of course.
K.
February 22, 2007 at 1:27 am #165081Penguin45
ParticipantRe: QED ?
I could compose something neutral and diplomatic and stick it up in General Trade – let a bit of debate ensue – if you wish……
Chris.
February 22, 2007 at 1:49 am #165082gegsy
ParticipantRe: QED ?
Penguin45 wrote:I could compose something neutral and diplomatic and stick it up in General Trade – let a bit of debate ensue – if you wish……
Chris.
Topic heading, “Moderators, Tossers or Tossed on” 😆Greg
February 22, 2007 at 10:32 pm #165083iadom
ModeratorRe: QED ?
Were angels fear to tread, :rolls: I spotted this one, no way was I going to get involved, I was quite prepared to let it sink slowly into the sunset. 😉
As soon as I read, ‘ I tried the heater on its own’ I thought OOHHH NOOOOOOOO. 😥Best of luck Chris. 😯
Jim.
February 22, 2007 at 11:08 pm #165084kwatt
KeymasterWe could always have an entrance exam…
… we could call it the “Prove You’re Not A Muppet” test.
K.
February 23, 2007 at 12:01 am #165085Dave_Conway
ParticipantRe: QED ?
He’s deffo goosed the wiring….
Who’s gonna tell him ? 😆
Dave.
February 23, 2007 at 12:33 am #165086Penguin45
ParticipantRe: QED ?
Which bit of “I hate to tell you this…….” is causing the problem? He’s ballsed it up and I’ve told him gently. I even suggested he might like to check his wiring diagram……… Not anything else I can do really, is there? Of course he might not actually have one, and I’m sure none of us have either……
“Moderators, Tossers or Tossed on”
There’s something in the bank if it all kicks off again.Apart from that, it’s been a great day. This morning found the van with a bloody great burnt patch on the top of the r/o/s tyre where some little toe-rag tried to set a fire. Fuel cap all smashed up as well, but fortunately still intact. Pub car park – landlord very upset as they had a car damaged as well. And it wasn’t the greatest days work I’ve ever had to top it all off.
Chris.
February 24, 2007 at 12:27 am #165087Penguin45
ParticipantRe: QED ?
And this mornings (yesterdays) events found the drivers door screwdrivered and the window wound down. Don’t get it – haven’t upset anybody locally for yonks…….. Interesting day driving around on a binbag due to soggy seat. Nothing in the van has been touched. Little b’stards – I’ll have ’em eventually.
Chris.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
