- This topic has 1,521 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 20 years, 2 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Re: QED ?
It must be the weather, or perhaps I attract the sarcastic clods.
I did see this clowns second post early this morning, decided to ignore it in the hope that he would wreck the valve and flood his kitchen. 👿
Glad to see that Martin actually gave him a slap, although I would have left him to stew. I am sure that Martin and everyone else knows that this Herbert knew exactly what I meant. He comes on asking for advice, gets a concise reply and starts getting all ‘clever dicky’ about double negatives. :rolls: As Martin pointed out whilst ‘not’ is a negative ‘ uncommon’ most certainly is not. A right PRAT, and a southern prat to boot. 😆
Jim.Re: QED ?
I hope I didn’t go over the top with this post, just thought it needed a bit of perspective.
Jim.
Re: QED ?
I cannot think of any famous Belgians 😉 , but I think I have found one that is going slightly mad. 😆
Jim.
Re: QED ?
Adolf Sax (Guess what he invented….), Marc de Troup (nasty), Tintin, the Chantrells (Moi – don’t tell Cookermann), The Singing Nun…….
They’re all here:
http://www.famousbelgians.net/Anyway – Phil59 – don’t know the fella, though he seems to know me. Might just check out the boards though – it’s only three miles away. Stand by.
Chris.
Re: QED ?
Penguin45 wrote:Adolf Sax (Guess what he invented….),
Don’t tell me, a funny little moustache, 😆
Jim.
Re: QED ?
xxxPORNOxxx
A new user with a very unhealthy interest in sex, check out his www link.
Greg
Now, now… 😉
Anyway Greg, tell Sean I’ll call him tomorrow as I got caught up in stuff this afternoon. 😕
K.
Re: QED ?
I have had a ‘mild’ complaint from a member with regard to the jokes thread in Off Topic. He feels that some of the recent posts including one from a fellow mod 😉 have become a little to risque in view of the fact that many female members could read them and possibly take offence.
Jim.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.