“Ooooh Matron” ?

Home Forums UK Whitegoods Moderator/Site Admin Forum “Ooooh Matron” ?

Viewing 15 posts - 946 through 960 (of 1,522 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #165418
    gegsy
    Participant

    Re: QED ?

    Oh dear, maybe a mod should delete the post??
    Ok Jim, who moaned? πŸ˜€
    Why they have to tittle tattle to another mod rather than PM me is beyond me πŸ˜• :rolls:

    the fact that many female members could read them and possibly take offence.

    now that sounds familiar, Im sure Ive said that in the past, hmmm πŸ˜•

    Greg

    #165419
    gegsy
    Participant

    Re: QED ?

    Have deleted my two cos I don’t need anymore grief TBH.

    Greg

    #165420
    Penguin45
    Participant

    Re: QED ?

    You getting abuse privately, Greg?

    Chris.

    #165421
    gegsy
    Participant

    Re: QED ?

    No Chris, just in general, thanks anyway for asking, appreciate that πŸ˜€

    Regards
    Greg πŸ˜‰

    #165422
    iadom
    Moderator

    Re: QED ?

    gegsy wrote:
    Why they have to tittle tattle to another mod rather than PM me is beyond me πŸ˜• :rolls:

    He is a personal friend who was e-mailing me on various matters, the perennial chestnut of to much information in the public forums amongst other things. He was a bit miffed that a joke he posted in the Off Topic forums was removed a while ago which was far less offensive or risquΓ© than several recent posts and on that point I had to concur.

    Jim.

    #165423
    gegsy
    Participant

    Re: QED ?

    Cheers for that Jim, I appreciate where he is coming from. Like I said I have removed my two risque jokes as they were a tad naughty on reflection 8)

    Regards

    Greg

    #165424
    Penguin45
    Participant

    Re: QED ?

    I suppose we could stick an announcement at the top of the forum outlining what is acceptable?

    Chris.

    #165425
    gegsy
    Participant

    Re: QED ?

    A good idea. Better one of you guys doing it as I would appear a hypocrite if I were to do it 8)
    See what K thinks?
    Greg

    #165426
    kwatt
    Keymaster

    Re: QED ?

    I was resisting. πŸ˜‰

    The problem is that if you place hard rules in play then you have to live by them. Far better to say that we like to keep it clean and leave it at that as that covers a multitude of sins.

    K.

    #165427
    iadom
    Moderator

    Re: QED ?

    Agree with Ken there. A gentle nudge if things start to creep over the bounds of reasonable content. I know that Martin has often voiced his concern. It should not be to difficult for our merry band to police this thread with common sense.

    Jim.

    #165428
    Martin
    Participant

    Re: QED ?

    iadom wrote:I know that Martin has often voiced his concern.

    So very often in fact. So much so that over the years I have deleted loads of stuff from there to try and retain some form of order as this after all is a whitegoods site and not a joke factory. 😈

    …..more tea vicar? :rolls:

    #165429
    gegsy
    Participant

    Re: QED ?

    2 lumps 😯 ooer matron πŸ˜‰ πŸ˜†

    Greg

    PS – Agree with Jim, a gentle nudge or if completely off the hook, instant deletion?

    #165430
    gegsy
    Participant

    Re: QED ?

    Any offers for this one 😯
    http://www.ukwhitegoods.co.uk/modules.p … 411#146411

    Greg

    #165431
    Penguin45
    Participant

    Re: QED ?

    I’ve obviously been misundedrstanding this for some years…… I had thought the Off Topic was where you could tell the jokes and all the rest of the smutty stuff, thus keeping the rest of the sacred forums sane, sensible and full of Whitegoods goodness.

    Which is why I dumped MacMinis offering into Off Topic from General Trade.

    Chris.

    #165432
    gegsy
    Participant

    Re: QED ?

    Best place for it then. Electronics has never been so much fun πŸ˜€

    Greg

Viewing 15 posts - 946 through 960 (of 1,522 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.