- This topic has 120 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 19 years, 6 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Re: Testing 1, 2, 3…
iadom wrote:‘You also do not want to replace something you should.’ WTF. 😕 .
I knew what I meant! 😆
Pity nobody else would have a clue. 😕
I’ve sorted it anyway as well as the spelling mistake.
The problem is that, whilstg I’ll do the body of these articles more oftne than not in Word, I’ll often spot/change/ammend as I go putting in the links and pictures.
K.
Re: Testing 1, 2, 3…
Could this article be moved from ‘Spare Parts’ to ‘Self Help’ I wonder?
http://www.ukwhitegoods.co.uk/modules.p … age&pid=82
….oh , and theres a typo error on the first line: We are oft asked on UK Whitegoods……….. 😉
Re: Testing 1, 2, 3…
Martin wrote:We are oft asked on UK Whitegoods
Could be “Olde English”…… Technically, it’s still grammatically correct!
Chris.
Re: Testing 1, 2, 3…
Thanks Martin, I’ll have shoppe@ next as well. I never did well with anything from that era and it is indeed an error albeit a correct error. Quite funny that actually if you’re a bit nerdy. 😕
I’ll sort it.
The reason that it’s in with spare parts is actually blindingly obvious, although there are other links to it (IIRC) in the self help bit. The reason is that most people come on looking for a part (usually a timer or module) and also ask what the error code means or if that will cure the problem. Therefore it makes sense (to me anyway) to tell that in the spares section simply because of the mails that Dave and I see.
The object being to try and cut down the stupid questions and saving us having to type “please use the forums” over and over, or just as much at least.
That said and that being the logic behind it being there, it does sit very well in either section but I didn’t really see any need to duplicate it.
K.
Re: Testing 1, 2, 3…
Sorry to be pedantic, but you have still got geet instead of get, in the bearing change article, 😉
Re: Testing 1, 2, 3…
Here’s another one to keep you all amused. 🙂
Please advise any errors or cock ups you spot.
I think it’s right and makes sense. 😕
K.
Re: Testing 1, 2, 3…
kwatt wrote:I think it’s right and makes sense.
It does indeed and I love it especially :
kwatt wrote:It’s not the Tardis after all
Inspired stuff indeed that makes very interesting reading with incontrovertible facts thrown in, brilliant!
Oh….and just for a change, no spelling mistakes…..10 out of 10 !! 😀
Re: Testing 1, 2, 3…
Well if I wanted to be reeeeeally picky and risk having my new found European forum mod status revoked 😉
I would mention this line,
the washing is tossed into the machine in no particular order or with much of any care.nicer would be, ‘in no particular order and without much care’. IMHO of course. 😀
Very good though. 99 out of 100 8)
Jim.
Re: Testing 1, 2, 3…
“looking at washing machines in white coats” – like the idea………
“This simply causes the tank from smacking off the outer casing through excessive vibration.” Know what you mean, but it isn’t English as we know it 😀 .Otherwise, excellent.
Chris.
Re: Testing 1, 2, 3…
Pah, rules. Rules are meant to be broken. Anway, if some prat can think that “U wll b l8 bt gr8” is English then I reckon I’m on the side of the righteous. 😉
But I sorted it anyway thanks.
Another one tonight as I finally got around to writing about idiot kitchen fitters a little. Apparently there’s an abundance of them.
Needs pictures and stuff, I’ll work on that tomorrow if I can.
Thing is, the other half is wanting me to paint this weekend which will seriously hamper my abilities to do much of anything I expect. Guess I can’t grumble too much, I’ve managed to evade it for about five years. 😕
K.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.