As promised, review of the ISEW1607W.

[Higher-water-level]

Re: As promised, review of the ISEW1607W.

I have been told I am a spoilsport for changing it back again!

Only one thing to do then………

I THINK QUICKWASH IS DELICIOUS………….

Oliver. 😳

[quickwash]

Re: As promised, review of the ISEW1607W.

What can i say…………………… 😆

[iadom]

Re: As promised, review of the ISEW1607W.

:con:

[Higher-water-level]

Re: As promised, review of the ISEW1607W.

iadom wrote::con:

Who altered it then.

Thanks everyone for making me look like a complete prawn!!!!!!!! 😆 😆 😆

Its a good job I know Quickwash or I would have been dead!! 😯

I’m not a spoilsport really! 😀

All good fun!! 😀

Best regards to everyone,

Oliver.

[quickwash]

Re: As promised, review of the ISEW1607W.

On this thread! 😀

Perhaps someone will pm me on how to do the ‘quote’ thingy for a thread please 😳 :rolls:

[Jaunty]

Re: As promised, review of the ISEW1607W.

Higher-water-level wrote:ALL CREDIT TO ISE AND ESPECIALLY KEN WATT. THIS ISSUE IS NOW RESOLVED.

The way ahead is with less detergent, there will be no impact on cleaning or the machine. Asko are still testing, but it looks cured for good. Our water is so soft we need about a seventh of the detergent on a normally soiled load.

So thank you so very much Ken. You have a lot to be proud off. ISE do have the super customer service that is advertised take it from me!!

Best Regards,

Oliver.
Glad to hear you made progress. It sounds like even in London with hard water we could use a lot less than the recommended doses (have switched to Ariel powder since we got the ISE10). We are using “less” but not a measured amount at all.EDIT – Just read p2mor’s thread. Guess we will try 50-60ml as our standard detergent amount and see how we go, with less if a small load as the auto sensing thingy will use less water? Does thaty seem about right?

[kwatt]

Hi Jaunty,

Yes, you’ll likely be fine at that.

K.

[Author]

Posts