Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Re: rapport
Ken, is the stock control down load working properly? i am downloading now, do i follow the install instructions for the call handling?
Re: A Naughty WTA Change Constitution!
Ok, let me just say this, i do not agree with the way the OP has handled this at all, i can only hope that the WTA statement on this will be of sufficient weight in dismmising the Op’s points and putting all us members at ease and we can look forward to the WTA supporting us members equally.
If there was anything untoward in the WTA then now would be a good time to erradicate them so we cam lay this episode to bed.
I will say no more here and i will await the WTA statement in this thread and the wta forum.Re: A Naughty WTA Change Constitution!
Just out of interest, Whirl4 where did you pop up from, have you been on holiday? You seem to dissapear then pop up and you normally have the same point of view as the moderators. I know i sometimes get these thoughts but i do get the feeling that on these forums some posters seem to have the same twang to them, probably just me seeing something that isnt there again, but then again i was the only one that questioned the FME thing and then this happens.
Just my opinion.Re: A Naughty WTA Change Constitution!
Lets calm down, all i want is to make sure that things dont get releted and we all play by the same rules, it would have been nice for someone to have sent me a message to say it was being deleted, martin says you sent him a message so why wasnt i afforded the same?
To answer the question about the “protractor” lets just say i am keeping an open mind as there is always 2 sides to every story and i do not speak for others or take council from others, thats why i sometimes drop my self in it!
I only want to try and voice my concerns and thoughts as i want the WTA to be as good as it can be and hope that there is no outside influence from othres with their own agenda.Re: The Enhanced Job Process
Interesting stuff Ted, it will all go full circle and quite right it did say on the letter to the agents that the contract would only be tempory, so why invest any more money for a short time influx of work, just shows what these people think of indies, throw some work at us and try to convince us we should be grateful! How refreshing it would be if indies turned around and said , stuff it we dont want your work, what would they do, they would have to start dialogue on our terms which as we all know we are reasonable in our needs, shame they are not.
On another matter Ted, has any one ever said that you write like Mr K Watt, are you and he the same person?
Re: A Naughty WTA Change Constitution!
Okay this is sort of linked, Ken you say Ade broke rules in deleting threads/posts, well who deleted Martins post “Sorry State of Affairs” ? I posted in that thread and i wasnt asked about it being deleted and my post was not against posting rules. Can that be explained as i dont want any one to think that there is one rule for some and another rule for others depending on what is said and who its about, it could back Ades “Kens Army” theory.
Re: A Naughty WTA Change Constitution!
I notice that Adrian still appears as a council member on the WTA website
Re: A Naughty WTA Change Constitution!
Okay, i think it is time to maybe lock this thread on the provisio that the WTA Council release a statement in good time to clarify the points and concerns made in this thread,this i feel is important for all current and future WTA members.
For it to continue would only bring the WTA in to question and despite what any one thinks i do not wish for that to happen.Re: A Naughty WTA Change Constitution!
I would never stand for election to the Council, i dont think any one would nominate me and i think i would quickly fall out with everyone and the membership would quite quickly be reduced to 1….. me! So if that was the reason then it was bloody daft and dosnt make sense, why the hell would i be such a problem?
Re: A Naughty WTA Change Constitution!
Sorry to sound boring, but still no answer as to why the constitution was changed, who authorised it, and for what benifit.
Also i still havnt recieved a pm with this personal post in it!Re: A Naughty WTA Change Constitution!
johnmac11 wrote:I think enough is enough in this topic, time to cool down and think before posting or the posts will be moderated before publication.
Stick to facts guys without the rhetoric.John
Are you joking? Moderation on the posts now will only add to the smoke and mirrors in this thread, i want answers and as yet they are not coming, also moderation would only back Ade’s theory of “Kens Army”.
Re: A Naughty WTA Change Constitution!
I am starting to think this is just you two having a go at each other, is it all hot air,niether is actually answering anything and the one question that should be answered is “Why was the Constitution of the WTA changed?”
Also where is this personal post of me Ade posted? its not in my inbox yet? Or is this not actually true?
Re: A Naughty WTA Change Constitution!
Well telling me to shut it isnt personal, someone says that to me everyday! One of you send me this post so i can make my own mind up.
