Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Baumatic WD602
John
That makes sense now you mention a Comet sale.
Baumatic don’t actually make any product but buy it in from others. Comet bought a range in under the Homark name from Westinghouse.
When Homark went belly up, Comet passed over to Baumatic some of these units for repair as they were the only ones at that time prepared and able to service them and subsequently marked some of the insurance products as a Baumatic product when it really wasn’t.
Those machines are known to us at Baumatic under model BTWM5 or BTWM6.
Fault Code F02 is insufficient drain within required time. Could be the drain pump or simply blocked.
Hope the above helps.
Regards
Jackal
beaumatic alabama range cooker SXF09060PTOOV
Hinge rollers part no. X431109?
PM me your email address and I will send you the exploded view and parts listing if you need it.
Jackal
Baumatic WD602
John hi
We are main Baumatic agents and don’t recognise the model number.
Baumatic don’t list a WD602 on the technical info site either.
Can you check the make and model and come back to me.
Regards
Jackal
Re: collecting your call out
Martin wrote:Money up front is not an option and on a pure legal footing could be construed as “taking money with menaces” anyway. The, pay me first or I won’t come and look at it, is so wrong on many levels when dealing directly, one to one, with your customer. Not least by flying in the face of the Supply of Goods & Services Act (1982) Maybe fine with landlords and letting agencies perhaps and best confined to that area of your business.
Your out of your depth and talking rubbish again Martin.
Payment up front is perfectly legitimate and valid, We as a company do it all the time, have never had any problem whatsoever. We handle around 1200 calls a week, do significant amounts of work for numerous Trading Standards and I personally, am a Court approved expert witness and consequently we are inspected regularly. Our business practises are well known to Trading Standards including the payment up front requirement on cash calls, in fact when the local TS direct a query our way, they warn the punter that they will have to pay my call out fee up front. Are you suggesting TS are assisting me break the law?
So payment up front is Demanding Money with menaces is it, a Criminal Offence under the Theft Act of 1978, punishable by inprisonment for a maximum of 15 years!
Well try buying a new car and paying for it on the day you get it, see how many car dealerships will do that. Try going to a fast food outlet McDonalds, KFC (other establishments are available) and having the items served before paying for it. I doubt many establishments will do it.
Or if you prefer a more general example, try buy something on line or via ebay and getting it delivered before you part with the money.
Or alternatively, how do you think Pay as You Go Mobile Phone Contracts, or Prepayment Gas/Electric services work?
Here is the said Act you mention Martin, please, tell me where does it say you cannot take the money up front for a Service?
Part II Supply of Services
12 The contracts concerned.(1)In this Act a “contract for the supply of a service” means, subject to subsection (2) below, a contract under which a person (“the supplier”) agrees to carry out a service.
(2)For the purposes of this Act, a contract of service or apprenticeship is not a contract for the supply of a service.
(3)Subject to subsection (2) above, a contract is a contract for the supply of a service for the purposes of this Act whether or not goods are also—
(a)transferred or to be transferred, or
(b)bailed or to be bailed by way of hire,
under the contract, and whatever is the nature of the consideration for which the service is to be carried out.
(4)The Secretary of State may by order provide that one or more of sections 13 to 15 below shall not apply to services of a description specified in the order, and such an order may make different provision for different circumstances.
(5)The power to make an order under subsection (4) above shall be exercisable by statutory instrument subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.
13 Implied term about care and skill.
In a contract for the supply of a service where the supplier is acting in the course of a business, there is an implied term that the supplier will carry out the service with reasonable care and skill.
Implied term about time for performance.
(1)Where, under a contract for the supply of a service by a supplier acting in the course of a business, the time for the service to be carried out is not fixed by the contract, left to be fixed in a manner agreed by the contract or determined by the course of dealing between the parties, there is an implied term that the supplier will carry out the service within a reasonable time.
(2)What is a reasonable time is a question of fact.
15 Implied term about consideration.
(1)Where, under a contract for the supply of a service, the consideration for the service is not determined by the contract, left to be determined in a manner agreed by the contract or determined by the course of dealing between the parties, there is an implied term that the party contracting with the supplier will pay a reasonable charge.
(2)What is a reasonable charge is a question of fact.
16 Exclusion of implied terms, etc.
(1)Where a right, duty or liability would arise under a contract for the supply of a service by virtue of this Part of this Act, it may (subject to subsection (2) below and the 1977 Act) be negatived or varied by express agreement, or by the course of dealing between the parties, or by such usage as binds both parties to the contract.
(2)An express term does not negative a term implied by this Part of this Act unless inconsistent with it.
(3)Nothing in this Part of this Act prejudices—
(a)any rule of law which imposes on the supplier a duty stricter than that imposed by section 13 or 14 above; or
(b)subject to paragraph (a) above, any rule of law whereby any term not inconsistent with this Part of this Act is to be implied in a contract for the supply of a service.
(4)This Part of this Act has effect subject to any other enactment which defines or restricts the rights, duties or liabilities arising in connection with a service of any description.
Martin, stick to what you know best, Twin Tubs and Sloping Fronts and let those of us qualified by having actually studied for years to obtain that first class honours degree and therefore the right to stick LLB after our names do what we do best.
Jackal
collecting your call out
Allsorts wrote:This is a case where a nationwide blacklist of customers would come in handy.
George
And be totally illegal in this country. If you want to blacken someone’s name you will need to get the approval of a County Court.
Now I ask how many of you check the registrar of CCJ’s BEFORE going out to you customers?
Exactly, so an illegal blacklist if customers is as much use as a chocolate teapot.
The real lesson, if you have a call out fee, take it up front before you call, genuine customers do mind, chancers like the one above will call you back when they carny get anyone else to fall for their scam.
Jackal
RegardsCDA CI993
Chris
Long time no post!!!!
Excellent to see you on here again my friend.
Jackal
ps sorry to hijack the thread
WORK DONE FOR A LETTING AGENT WHO HAS GONE BUST
Then you need to put it down to experience and write it off I am afraid.
Jackal
WORK DONE FOR A LETTING AGENT WHO HAS GONE BUST
Depends on your terms and conditions at the time of supply.
Did you include an indemnity clause co joining the landlord in the event if non payment by the letting agency?
Jackal
Re: Rejected Claims
bazza500
I got one which was rejected because I didnt put ANY serial number on because we didnt have it. We didnt have it because the call was cancelled prior to us arriving and we closed the job down accordingly, charging……
wait for it ……
building the suspense……
NOTHING, ZERO, SQUAT, NOWT, BUGGER ALL, ZILCH etc.
And yes they rejected a £0.00 invoice and ARE claiming it back.
There is a degree of incompetence occuring somewhere which is surpassing even my cyincial levels.
Jackal
Rejected Claims
Ade your right on the ball. 6 years is correct, otherwise the debt/claim is stutter barred.
Jackal
Re: Go Local
Issued a Court Summons for non payment against both the company and the customer concered.
Customer goes ballistic and goes hunting for the guy (customer was a court bailiff).
Long story short, Mr Daniel Waterhouse calls me the day before the court hearing and pays everything owed in full. Claims because to moveing address twice in a month the invoice had gotten lost, yea right! Strange though the summons had gotten to him and so had his customer.
Why not give Daniel Waterhouse a call on his personal mobile which is 07534 343650.
Remember, if your terms and conditions are watertight, you can issue a Court Summons against both Go Local Reactive Limited AND the customer whom received the benefit of your goods and services.
Go through Money Claim Online and you dont even have to post the letter.
Remember to let us know how it goes so others dont fall into a trap.
Best wishes and good luck.
Regards
Jackal
Haus dishwashers
Simon hi
I will check in the morning but I think I have them in stock.
Please email me your details so I can confirm for you.
CEO (at) conceptservicegroup dot co dot uk
Regards
Jackal
door seal lg
It’s the right door deal it is now fitted with separate rubber bungs for the drain holes.
Will sort out the part no when I get home.
Jackal
