johnmac11

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,501 through 1,515 (of 1,760 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Look at what you’re missing #129059
    johnmac11
    Participant

    Re: Look at what you’re missing

    razor is based in Dumbarton, don’t think he will go as far as Surrey ๐Ÿ˜†


    John

    in reply to: dquinn? #147147
    johnmac11
    Participant

    Re: dquinn?

    Penguin45 wrote:I take it that the other penguin is a trainer? He posts, but his posts can’t be found?

    I take it there must be a hidden trainers forum for these guys?

    Think it is a bloody cheek stealing you name though Penguin, If I was you I would copyright it before anyone else has it. Big rush for the fish dishes at Sibson :rotfl:

    in reply to: dquinn? #147145
    johnmac11
    Participant

    kwatt wrote:admin at UKW Towers

    :rotl:


    Should that not say corporate headquarters

    John

    in reply to: dquinn? #147144
    johnmac11
    Participant

    Re: dquinn?

    Dave runs the UKW office, sorry Dave appears in the office and drinks all the coffee. ๐Ÿ˜†


    John

    in reply to: heavy duty american top loader #147103
    johnmac11
    Participant

    Re: heavy duty american top loader

    Dont know about the Maytag but Whirlpool american top loaders do not have a heater.

    John

    in reply to: lpr600 #147003
    johnmac11
    Participant

    Re: lpr600

    The older type ntc’s had spade connectors, the new ones have rast connectors and come with a cable to connect them to the ccu at the bottom/front.

    If the ccu is at the top of the door all you do is cut the wires at the ntc and fit the new rast connector supplied in the pack


    John

    in reply to: Nonsense #135477
    johnmac11
    Participant

    Re: Nonsense

    kwatt wrote:All public forums should now be restricted to registered users only K.

    Exactly what I said 2 months ago!!!!!

    At the end of the day if a member of public wants to post about a problem with their machine they can at least register, they get the rest for free. If you go ahead and do this it would IMO kill 99{e5d1b7155a01ef1f3b9c9968eaba33524ee81600d00d4be2b4d93ac2e58cec2d} of the spam in one go.

    It won’t stop the guests from reading the public forums so the hits will still keep coming.

    John

    in reply to: Soap Powders & Technology Training #104316
    johnmac11
    Participant

    Re: Soap Powders & Technology Training

    Just to follow on from Ken’s post I had the pleasure of Rob, Grahame and George (the trainers) and Mr K Heath (the coffee drinker) at my office last night for what I understand to be the first training session of UKW. Before they started they apologised in advance because they thought the presentation/training session might not be a slick as should be due to the fact that it was the first one they had done. The apology was not required as the evening went well and training was first class and very professional.

    I had 10 engineers in the office last night for training and asked them all beforehand what they thought they would learn and 8 of them said they would not learn anything new. The funny thing is, 6 of the 8 have over 120 years experience between them so I assume they thought they new it all, WRONG!!!

    Spoke to the 8 sceptics after the meeting and they all had to admit they had learned a lot during the evenings training. The most popular phrase I heard after the training was “I never knew that………..”

    If anyone reading this has not enquired about the training yet get on the phone to David and book it. I know itโ€™s hard to believe but the training is FREE so what have you got to lose

    I would like to thank the guys for all the hard work they put into last night and would hope that anyone else getting the training in the future will post here to let us all know how it went.


    John

    in reply to: Nonsense #135472
    johnmac11
    Participant

    Re: Nonsense

    they were out in force last night, deleted 19 this morning over the first coffee.

    Something just struck me though, It seems to be on different posts that they stick this crap all the time except for one post that seems to have some new spam every day

    “Bish-Bosch dodgy wash! SGS 43A12 GB/27 Exxcel problem”

    So I take it we can assume that it is a pissed off Bosch customer that is posting the spam ๐Ÿ˜†

    John

    in reply to: UKW CHARTER (amendments) #141031
    johnmac11
    Participant

    Re: UKW CHARTER (amendments)

    Penguin45 wrote:At least he hasn’t posted it up twice, John


    Ok, Ok pick on the poor Scotsman now ๐Ÿ˜ณ . I did notice the duplicate post before now but have not got permission to delete posts in the AC forums.


    John

    PS. Its half time and Scotland are 1 up against Italy :scots:

    What is the odds on me being happy in a hour’s time?

    in reply to: Sanctions #139088
    johnmac11
    Participant

    Re: Sanctions

    Now that the charter looks as good as finished it must be time to move on to sanctions. When we go to Sibson I imagine the first question on everyoneโ€™s mind after they hear the charter is “What if a member does not comply?”

    I have sketched out my thoughts above so can we have some thought on any amendments that need done?


    John

    in reply to: UKW CHARTER (amendments) #141029
    johnmac11
    Participant

    Re: UKW CHARTER (amendments)

    Del wrote:I’ve run it through spell checker too for good measure.

    Del wrote:If everyone can signify in the usuall manner

    Sorry Sean, couldn’t resist it. ๐Ÿ˜€


    I think the time has come to laminate the charter


    John

    in reply to: UKW CHARTER (amendments) #141026
    johnmac11
    Participant

    Re: UKW CHARTER (amendments)

    Alex wrote:Couple of little spelling mistakes

    Alex, you seem to have forgotten the Sean is an Irishman from Stoke now Living in Wales. Microsofts spelling checker can’t cope with this combination :rotl:


    All looks fine by me. :tup:


    John

    johnmac11
    Participant

    Re: A good lightweight vacume cleaner for my mother (who is

    in my opinion it means in my opinion


    John

    in reply to: whirlpool amz650 drain seal #145431
    johnmac11
    Participant

    Re: whirlpool amz650 drain seal

    The part no you require is 481246688517
    If you send an email to spares@ukwhitegoods.co.uk they will sort you out. cost is approx ยฃ6 plus postage

    John

Viewing 15 posts - 1,501 through 1,515 (of 1,760 total)