Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
lee8
ParticipantRe: oven removing table
Between £250-£300 depending on your build specific. The ability of the base to slide in and out of a vehicle on and off the base works well, for me well worth the cost.
lee8
ParticipantRe: ISE Appliances cease trading-who deals with warranty cla
Who was running ISE then?
lee8
ParticipantRe: oven removing table
Watch the video on the link provided. Why use the anything else.
Here is mine.

lee8
ParticipantRe: ISE Appliances cease trading-who deals with warranty cla
Never believe the hype, which is why l never bought into the ISE ethos for my clients, the products being built by the companies ISE slagged off seemed to me as pure marketing. You cannot compare a semi commercial product against a domestic one, completely different beasts. So no never believe the PR especially if there are some obviously iffy claims.
lee8
ParticipantRe: oven removing table
http://www.ke-group.com/home/ke-handling/50-ke-handling
This works well for me.
December 19, 2014 at 9:00 pm in reply to: Siemens dishwasher – food residue left – cleaned filters etc #422821lee8
ParticipantRe: Siemens dishwasher – food residue left – cleaned filters
Cos there so different.
lee8
ParticipantRe: Who provides ISE warranty?
I see Adrian is back with his altar ego.
lee8
ParticipantRe: The Great British Media
It would work if everybody had an honest intention and an average IQ. Problem is the law, legislation does not account for muppets and liars.
lee8
ParticipantRe: The eBay revolution
Let’s be grateful for the crumbs.
lee8
ParticipantRe: Bosch oven hinge problem
If it’s the ones I’m thinking of you can swap them over by turning them upside down.
lee8
ParticipantRe: The Great British Media
Lawyers usually don’t learn the law, hence the large reference materials found in their offices and ultimately it’s why people go to court, both parties will have different opposing interpretation of the relevant law.
So why is a sales person anymore qualified to comment on a “law” that ultimately requires a Judge to decide each dispute on there own merits.
lee8
ParticipantRe: Dangerous part ll
It’s interesting as the numbers of incidents pre testing and compared to other developed countries would suggest either the tests are not carried out and results inaccurate or testing has little benefit.
lee8
ParticipantRe: Dangerous part ll
Even the most diligent have come unstuck.
lee8
ParticipantRe: Customer warranties on repairs
Glad l don’t have to deal with these peeps.
lee8
ParticipantRe: Dangerous part ll
HSE recently made its opinion clear regarding PAT tests being carried out yearly, in most situations it’s viewed as overly cautious, places such as construction sites frequent testing yes, but an office no its not required.
As for who is responsible after a repair, who’s to say the owner didn’t open up an appliance after a repair. Proving responsiblity is a minefield. -
AuthorPosts
