Home › Forums › General Trade Forum › NAC (ADVERT THREAD: IGNORE IT)
- This topic has 291 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 7 months ago by
admin.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 25, 2013 at 7:19 pm #400621
Jackal
ParticipantRe: National Appliance Care ?
It’s not Tonto, it Gonzo or Fozzie!
October 25, 2013 at 7:34 pm #400622SAMURI
ParticipantRe: National Appliance Care ?
No everyone likes the Muppets.
He must be the Lone Ranger.
Bob 😀
October 25, 2013 at 7:44 pm #400623lee8
ParticipantRe: National Appliance Care ?
This reminds me of a relationship between a rich ugly geek and a greedy tart.
Bit of an obsession.:lol:
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2
October 25, 2013 at 11:31 pm #400624kwatt
KeymasterRe: National Appliance Care ?
Jackal wrote:It’s not Tonto, it Gonzo or Fozzie!
SAMURI wrote:No everyone likes the Muppets.
He must be the Lone Ranger.
Those two posts rank among the best of all time. Utterly brilliant. 😆
K.
October 31, 2013 at 3:03 pm #400625jamieparrie
ParticipantRe: National Appliance Care ?
hello.ok i have no idea what you are on about.i am a self employed engineer from cardiff.adie doesnt live in wales anymore so you are wrong and kwatt or anyone can phone me if you want to speak to me.if not,i suggest no further accusations be made.
my comments last page about facts were said to the best of my knoledge and still there is noone that says any different exept kwatt martin and samari all of who dont do any work for national appliance care so its all just rubbish and its clear any negative from them aimed at adie or national appliance care is based on dislike for the person,not fact about national appliance care.
spoken to adie and i will no longer comment in here about national appliance care.he says if anyone wants to know anything just contact them directly.so based on that there is no need to speculate,just pick the phone up or email them.
jamie.October 31, 2013 at 3:17 pm #400626kwatt
KeymasterRe: National Appliance Care ?
kwatt wrote:So, zero interest.
Although when you applied for trade access it wasn’t as a self-employed appliance engineer, it was as an employee of a company in Wales and your name did not specifically appear on any documentation.
Which, with your intimate knowledge of NAC and fervent support raises suspicion as to who exactly is using this account. Also, irrespective of what you might say, there is no evidence to support that either way.
For any such queries as is the norm, everything would be done in writing so that there is a visible record of all.
K.
October 31, 2013 at 3:41 pm #400627jamieparrie
ParticipantRe: National Appliance Care ?
excuse me?.i am not an employe of noone?.my application clearly states im self employed and you are more than welcome to phone me to clarify is.
i saw in another forum here that it gets split if going away from the topic so why dont you split this and then when when you phone me you can then post that i am jamie,sole proprietor of assured electrical based in acrdiff.
my intimate as you call it knowlege just comes from doing a lot of work for them and enjoying the cashflow,experience and volume.as i enjoy the work i liked to speak up for them as i thought they got unfair judging by people that have not work for them.thats it.
i am not going to speak about national appliance care anymore as its been told to me that there isnt any point and things in this forums are led by a small number of people that most of the time have no first hand experience of ehat they are being negative towards.i suppose its typical forum experience.but anyway…………………… please split this forum if you want to continue talks about me as it is not related to national appliance care and is as was said in another forum here diluting the topic.
jamieOctober 31, 2013 at 4:02 pm #400628kwatt
KeymasterRe: National Appliance Care ?
It’s not split because if this is a ruse, we’d want people to see it. Full disclosure and all that.
It’s funny you know, I’ve done work for a lot of companies in my time and I’ve never had that level of detail shared, even doing much higher volumes than you claim to be getting.
So you’ll have to excuse me if I’m more than a little skeptical about a lot of this.
K.
October 31, 2013 at 4:25 pm #400629jamieparrie
ParticipantRe: National Appliance Care ?
kwatt.you can call me,email me or even come to see me.
i am me and not noone else and i dont care if i get 3 or 30000 jobs a weeks from national appliance care because it is still me and that shouldnt make a differense to anything!.
the fact that tou are very sceptical and suspicious but wont contact me goes to show you just want readers to believe a myth.
the fact that you wont split this forum also shows that you are one rule for one and another for everyone else.
this forum should be about national appliance care,not who i am.
you have an open soor to come see me in real life and i assure you i am no muppet.and on that note,jakal,samari are also welcome.calling people a muppett in a forum is like a 5 year old.you also have open door to call me so either do so or drop it.
really bored and angry at this now as you and your people just insult,insinuate and speak here with nothing to back it up.
i am not even going to bother repling to you here no more as its just pathetic.
jamie.October 31, 2013 at 4:55 pm #400630lee8
ParticipantRe: National Appliance Care ?
Whats your address l can be in Cardiff in 10 minutes.:lol:
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2
October 31, 2013 at 5:05 pm #400631kwatt
KeymasterRe: National Appliance Care ?
Here’s why I’m skeptical.
A few days after this really kicked off and all was called into question I get this lot from the Adrian that’s such a great guy….
Adrian Welke 18:55 16/09/13) wrote:Ken hi, we need to talk at some point. History is history, the past is the past. I’m aware of the thread & content in UKW about National Appliance Care and the slanderous comments by lee8. however, I’m also aware of the SMALL number of people that speak out for us. Lots more have told me about it but have also stated they don’t want to get involved and run the thread on & on & on & on! The rate NAC is growing, there’s no need to be on unfriendly grounds as WTA Members clearly love what we do & the results we produce. Over half of our engineers are WTA Members and ‘Maybe’ thanks to the link in the thread, more want to join, one company in specific, we signed up today. Anyways… I’m sick of people ringing me about things that are said. I think we should have a meet & discuss the facts. The fact that you personally don’t like NAC shouldn’t come in to the equation… The WTA Members I speak to daily or weekly all state that they like & benefit from NAC so like it or lump it, we’re here to stay. We’d obviously prefer to work together or at least be able to talk to each other, but that’s up to you. What I will say is that NAC produces 100’s of confirmed, pre-qualified & quoted calls per month. We are very, VERY successful at competing with Repaircare & 0800 that do the same but pay peanuts. Yes, we get £20 per accepted job, but trust me its hard work. Over all, the engineers are happy and obviously like what we do due to feedback, bills being paid on time & lots of calls wanting more / larger areas. I hope you get in touch. Adrian Welke, National Appliance Care.
I didn’t respond.
A couple of days later I get this (some stupid childish smiley’s removed)….
Adrian Welke 19:37 (18/09/13) wrote:Ola Ken… Keep the negative comments coming and links in 0800 Thread to draw attention to NAC… 7 Engineers in 3 days alone have expressed interest!!! And that’s from your link!!! No-one is commenting bad stuff that get work from us, the ones that do get work from us comment good stuff (Excluding those that can’t be arsed to join the kids on UKW)… So on this one my friend, you are just doing us good! 🙂 Cheers butt 🙂 Ade P.S… Thought you’d be pleased that there is now a way to compete with Repaircare & 0800 whilst leaving the engineer the ‘Lions Share’… Heyho… Must be me that’s got it wrong! You know why I ‘Love’ this situation? Because you know, what I’ve done is not only ground breaking and goes against the tradition of a WP, but it’s popular… As in ‘Bloody Popular’. And because you don’t like it & hearing that you try slag off our way… It makes me smile! Love it … Cheers mate x
Then the night shift starts, probably after too much beer and a Dominos…
Adrian Welke 23:19 (18/09/13) wrote:Wait until you hear about TradeDesk! Job & Stock Management done the right way! Currently being beta tested by WTA Members and live to public in 4 weeks!!! Lol… You’re going to go ape!
Adrian Welke 21:19 (18/09/13) wrote:You’ve done the wrong thing by ignoring me. Im here to stay… Like it or lump it 🙂
Adrian Welke 23:26 (18/09/13) wrote:Sneak peek xx
Adrian Welke 23:33 (18/09/13) wrote:Haha! Sent an early screenshot. Here’s an up to date one. Regardless of what you say about me or my interests… Trust me… I’ll always be involved, somewhere. So keep it up 🙂 That’s what drives me to succeed.
Adrian Welke 23:51 (18/09/13) wrote:The good thing about iMessage is that it says when ‘Read’. As emails have not been replied to and voicemails have not been replied to, please take this TXT as notice:
There are comments in your forums about me personally that I request are removed due to the untrue nature. The comments I demand to be removed are:
Ade business has gone tits up. Tradtalk is owned by Webfusion and they have assets in excess of £120,000,000, so I doubt Mr Ade is involved. He’s probably returned to the Car sales industry, ops no he wasn’t much good at that either.
That is posted in your ‘Another Referral Service’ Thread of ‘The Rumour Mill’. There is no proof behind the fact that I was not any good at selling cars, therefore the comment is slanderous.
And:
Sounds like ade, not to bright, not well thought out and likely to be added to the list of other failed businesses.
I do not have a ‘List’ of failed businesses. Without the backing of proof, this is also slanderous.
As the website owner, you have a duty and care to ensure that what is published is fact. Even within a ‘Trade Only’ Access forum, slander can be claimed. In this instance, I claim that the posts made have no legal or factual proof so I demand that those comments be withdrawn immediately.
Failure to withdraw the above comments will result in legal action.
Kind Regards
Adrian Welke
Then all went quiet. Probably far too much beer and Dominos wore off.
But the following morning….
Adrian Welke 19:37 (18/09/13) wrote:Morning buddy… Had to TXT as I just had a chuckle or 2. I’m not really going ‘Legal’ over things said about me, they’re funny to hear about and there are other things to spend money on, such as the rapid growth of NAC! Our paths will cross again at some point, it’s a long olde time until I retire … Anyways… Have a nice day
Now there are, like the the author, some things jumping up and down screaming for attention in that lot as I’m sure many will agree.
The first that I take great exception to is, why should I support or lift a finger to help someone who so clearly demonstrates that they have a problem with me, this website, the WTA and so on? To the degree that, apparently, they are trying to mimic a lot of what is done by them.
That would be a bit daft of me and others I’d suspect.
Then there’s the small matter of quoting lee8 in one text, who clearly Mr Welke also has issue with (anyone seeing a trend here?) whilst being banned from and, supposedly holding no access to this website.
This raises the question, how did he get that?
Clearly he has either been passed this information by someone directly, a copy and paste job or, quite likely, he has been given someone’s login details. The latter for sure a clear breach of the site’s privacy policy.
But the funniest thing of all, is the timing. Put that together with the claims, the content, the mannerisms and you get real suspicious, real fast.
All that before we even get into the threats, the phone calls and a heap of other stuff.
So, yes, I am skeptical and with a mountain of reasons to be so and you claiming that you are Joe Bloggs, Barak Obama or whoever doesn’t preclude the very real possibility that the account details and login are compromised.
I think that “the kids on UKW” have the right to be able to see what’s going on and make their own minds up about just who and what they are dealing with here.
K.
October 31, 2013 at 5:16 pm #400632jamieparrie
ParticipantRe: National Appliance Care ?
really? :rolls:
i think its only fair if you say things like that then he has a right to reply.but as he doesnt then its just all rubbish.one sided arguments in this forum about national appliance care.you obviously dont like him and thats fine but be a man.
jamieOctober 31, 2013 at 5:21 pm #400633kwatt
KeymasterRe: National Appliance Care ?
Nope. He can go pull flowers so far as I’m concerned.
What’s to reply, those are directly copied messages that were not asked for and not responded to even once, it’s not a debate or an argument even slightly. He said what he said, did what he did. Fact. End of.
But I thought you were done posting on here?
K.
October 31, 2013 at 5:31 pm #400634jamieparrie
ParticipantRe: National Appliance Care ?
yes but you then showed you are like 8 years old.writing things that cant be answeed by the person is very sad.any reader only has your word that those writings are true and even if they were true,they do not have the benefit of a reply by adie in here so this is all very very very one sided.
my only bothers are that you acuse me of being adie and at same time refuse oportunity to clarify.
end of.October 31, 2013 at 5:36 pm #400635kwatt
KeymasterRe: National Appliance Care ?
Deal with it.
K.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
