- This topic has 291 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 7 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Re: National Appliance Care ?
he just said to post this pgoto and see how long it takes to be take down.
Re: National Appliance Care ?
Now that’s interesting.
A conversation I don’t recall.
A topic I have no knowledge of but, here’s the kicker as anyone will know here that has ever requested a password reset…
I nor anyone else has access to anyone else’s password. Admin cannot see it.
I do not have nor ever have had, Adrian or anyone else’s password.
Therefore I’d have to assume that is a fabrication. About as valid as reading Text From A Dog.
But, the account for jamieparrie is now moderated as I am convinced that the account is compromised and being used by multiple users given that a Virgin BB connection and two separate mobile devices on different services are being used from different geographical locations.
Sorta says a lot.
K.
Re: National Appliance Care ?
jamieparrie wrote:hello.ok i have no idea what you are on about.i am a self employed engineer from cardiff.
The dirty half dozen Bob. Only six engineers to train a bit odd though in light of the comment above. 😉
K.
Re: National Appliance Care ?
Hey I get a mention, like it would bother me anyone winding me up, wouldn’t bother me one iota. Actually made me laugh, any one who really knows me will know what I am about and to be honest I have fell out with most of the movers on here, including ken, but I tell you what I would trust him when I got down to the life or death call!
Back on track, just like to say good luck with the new venture ade, hope it works out for you but dragging this stuff up isn’t the way forward at all, move on and when your made it to the top then stick 2 fingers up at the rest of us,.
Re: National Appliance Care ?
Ade’s business history is in the public domain for all to read.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2
Re: National Appliance Care ?
exactly lee8 so why dont people go see and speak to him rather than speculate here where he has no voice to reply or speak?.
Re: National Appliance Care ?
lee8 was referring to…
Adrian Welke wrote:I do not have a ‘List’ of failed businesses. Without the backing of proof, this is also slanderous.
There is proof, all you need do is pull off the records from Companies House so, it isn’t and cannot be slanderous. Asides slander is spoken, libel is written so even the language for the statement is incorrect in that little gem.
K.
Re: National Appliance Care ?
i looked and dont see any failed businesses for him.
due dil shows all director appointment and none there i can see that had a list of failed busnesses soo maybe hes right!
grow up kwat.you are looking as daft as me now by arguing with me over adie.
i think hes a nice guy.so i stick up for him here in this forums.end of.
other people might not like him but thats fine but what had that got to do with national appliance care?. i think we are gong off forum topic now?.Re: National Appliance Care ?
So much for not posting anymore. :rolls:
I seem to recall someone else that didn’t know when to shut up…
Another funny thing, you’re putting a lot of effort into defending someone here with a lot of seemingly sensitive knowledge. I can’t help but wonder why that would be among a myriad of other things that just don’t make sense unless you are Adrian Welke, you’ve allowed him access or, you’re very close to him.
Loved the fabricated message BTW, made me laugh right before I rejected it. But for the record, that’s libel, not slander so if I threaten any action over that falsehood or any other message that’s been bodged up in an app then it’s libel I’d be suing for and not slander.
As for the other one earlier, we do have an email that explicitly proves that it is false.
Just so you can tell your buddy who I reckon must be telling some porkies to you, or himself.
That’s not slander, it’d be libel. Except for the small issue that it is not stated as a fact or can be construed as such, it is an opinion and as such cannot be used to take any action. Just so I don’t get any stupid text messages at silly o’clock threatening some sort of idiotic legal action again.
Not that I care much because “Do Not Disturb” is the best feature on iOS for idiots that do that sort of moronic cr4p.
K.
Re: National Appliance Care ?
:rolls: off topic?.
how old are you kwat?.reads like your 6.
you obviously dont like adie but hes doing something right so that annoys you?.
id say get over it.
jamieRe: National Appliance Care ?
I wonder if ade got his advice from his lawyer.
I use the name ade as to be liabulususus you have to use a persons name, in full, sudomumusses etc are not identifiable to the general publico and therefore not liablus.
Also a closed forum has limited access and therefore a libel action attempt is likely to cause any solicitor to fall about laughing if you tried.
As for Ken, being the owner of the site, that stupid and pathetic attempt at damaging kens intergrity is another matter and would warrant an action, in my opinion.
But then again judges can appear sometimes to be less aggressive in there punishment of retards.:lol:
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2
Re: National Appliance Care ?
wow really?we go from someone asking about national appliance care to me being adie then liable stuff in forums after lots of shouting?.
such a grown up place this is.
jamieRe: National Appliance Care ?
jamieparrie wrote::rolls: off topic?.
Goes to character and intent. Not off topic since the merits of NAC are under discussion.
jamieparrie wrote:how old are you kwat?.reads like your 6.
Try adding a few decades to that. I know it may prove be stressful but give it a go anyway.
jamieparrie wrote:you obviously dont like adie but hes doing something right so that annoys you?.
id say get over it.I have no interest or sentiment one way or the other, it’s irrelevant as all that would be is my opinion and the value of that lies entirely with the person reading or listening to it.
I’d far rather deal in demonstrable facts. That is, not a list of “facts” but, real stuff without the rhetoric and BS.
Whether he’s doing something right or wrong, no clue and cannot comment as I don’t have the information to do so. I have some rhetoric from one person, you, beyond that not a lot to form much of an opinion one way or another.
The validity of the person using this account is debatable. Therefore, logically, the accuracy or indeed plausibility of what is presented by the person posting under the moniker is questionable. I should think that has been demonstrated rather well wouldn’t you say?
Therefore, so far as I am concerned, I am either talking to Ade or a person acting on his behalf directly. You can stamp your feet, go off in a strop and scream till the cows come home to the contrary but, the evidence thus far points extremely strongly to that conclusion being correct.
The reason is very simple, there’s little to support any other conclusion.
As for both drdill and lee8, asides from thank you both for the kind words, both of them and I have locked horns on a number of occasions but, do not make the mistake of us having a disagreement and peeing each other off for a rift. That’s just the way it is, we don’t see eye to eye and we get all up in each other’s faces on occasion. Our opinions differ and there’s no bones made about that but, it isn’t personal.
And, there’s the yawning gulf, whilst they may be at times the biggest PITA’s that walk the Earth to me, I can still respect the professionalism and opinion, even when they are wrong. But, they listen to reason and understand that we don’t all always agree and, that sometimes it’s huge fun to be that way as it adds to the forum to bing ideas around, even if they’re wrong. (yes, I know I repeated that) 😉
But would I attempt to assassinate the character of either? Not without good reason and sound just cause I wouldn’t.
The fact that they agree with me, well that kinda says a lot as they rarely do.
All I need now is Martin to chime in and agree and we have the full house. 😆
To get all four of us to agree would, I think, be a first in living memory. If you manage that, kudos for that accomplishment. But, what a statement that would be at the same time.
The mods, the other one person at least that was seriously affected by Ade’s behaviour have chosen to hang back and not get involved, I don’t blame them for that in the slightest. But I feel I must caution you that if you choose to provoke them enough they may well also chime in, I doubt very much that will be a good thing for Ade given the givens.
By all means though, you carry on and have fun.
K.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.