Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Re: The 0800 Thread
kwatt wrote:
No, you can dismiss an employee for “gross misconduct” without going through that process.
K.
Thanks K.
Didn’t know that.. but what would be the case if he were a franchisee?
Re: Whirlpool Freezer Compressor
Hi Bob…
Someone has requested a purchase of one.
The only note to me is the request for a ‘New Motor’ and as far as I am concerned they are referring to the compressor. They just say it has a fault.
I would love to be able to do them myself… but as yet I do not have the required skills.
George
Re: The 0800 Thread
Thankyou to the Mods of this wonderful site for removing the information requested ;
_________________________________________________________Now can we get this back on track please..
I feel that the image and the action where there not for scrutiny of what the action was, but just that the action was an inappropriate action for a member of a group who profess to be above all in their manners and integrity. Alike, the image was not there to endeavour to identify the individual assailant personally, or to create any discord or reprisals for the actual assailant; the point of the imagewas to show the evident 08oo identification and the action.
I consider a repremand for the action quite enough punishment. If the 08oo employee or franchiser (whichever it may be) has been removed from the 08oo list then I consider that action to be excessive and depending on the circumstances, possibly against UK employment law (Conduct unbecoming).
The question that Funkyboogy made was a very pertinant one to the subject matter of this thread:
was the guy franchise or contractor ?
Another very pertinant is also a very pertinant one to the subject matter of this thread is the point that the action in the photograph should bring into question and immediately override the website reported demenor of the company employees / contractors / franchisees, in that one of the original complaints was regarding the structure and content of the website and the message given out therein.
No embellishments can be made of the photographic evidence by anyone here, Funkboogy is correct in saying that the camera does not lie.. the only embellishments to the evidence is the fact that (if reports are truth) the assailant has been removed from his employment.. If this is a correct report then it just infers that 08oo higherarchy got a little upset at his actions.. far more upset than did I.
______________________________________________________
Edited serveral times for the benefit of your reading.Re: The 0800 Thread
A request has been placed for the editing out of the facebook profile name as suggested.
My appologies for placing it there in the first place.
Edited as requested R600A
Re: The 0800 Thread
Stratfordgirl I am not probing for details, nor am I trying to humiliate the guy .. If he has lost his job over this then I think that an unruley decision that has been made by 08oo… UK law should stand in all aspects of employment… 3 written warnings etc.
So, as I said earlier,
If it is him, he has asked politely for us to remove any photo’s.
Irrespective if it is him or not… someone has POLITELTY asked for the photo’s to be removed… I Say No More.. It is up to whomever has photos still at large whether they wish to remove them or not.. So stop giving me grief over it… The quote above is what I was saying. AND, by UK law, he has committed a crime… but we wont get into that.
Although.. yes, I do agree… and this would take a mod to do so… Please edit out the profile name of the above response. My appologies.. I did not think of that but wanted to just advertise the guys request ‘If it was him’.
Re: The 0800 Thread
mikeday0800 wrote:
Come on guys that should end this now. FYI he did lose his job and the proof will be no van with him in it in that area.
What are you complaining at now Mike? Fb is just saying that he likes the picture composure and is wondering what the phone was.
The end of what?… I am not doing anything other than reporting the fact that ‘a person’ has politely asked for the pic to be removed…
If you recall.. it was I that stated that it would be up to 08oo to determine if his employment status remains positive and noone else… that as far as I was concerned he should receive 3 written warnings before loosing his ’employment if UK law is any guide. However, as everyone has been saying, 08oo is a franchise situation and in that respect they would have to remove his franchise.
Re: The 0800 Thread
funkyboogy wrote:all same george it was a damm good photo – was that iphone ?..
you should think of giving the Murdoch,s a call – they could use a a talented snapper like you
That was one of those Blackberry torch thingymebobs … I still find it difficult to use but I’m getting better at it.
Re: Councils ‘failing’ companies that want to recycle
At least the drum is also getting recycled 🙂
Re: The 0800 Thread
I just received this to my Facebook inbox… I am presuming that this is the 08oo guy because it is the only person that I have published photos of, although it doesn’t look like him.
Hi George im so sorry for what i did to you that day im regretting it alot now i realice what i did im sorry i have just lost my job over it agian i cant ask enough for forgiveness im sorry once again could i ask if you could please remove the photo of me im so sorry once again.
If it is him, he has asked politely for us to remove any photo’s.
George
Re: Customer quoting Sale of Goods.
Has anyone appoached Bosch regarding to this incident and the wishes of the customer?…
I have in the past had parts from the manufacturer for free and just charged the customer for the repair.Re: Find My Recycler (Beta)
Sorry, the recycler@findmyrecycler.co.uk email address was not working acording to a few people… The problem is corrected now, but if you have any more problems just leave me a response here and I will contact you.
