Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
A lot of the information is here:
http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/ne … 4/?lang=_e
and
http://164.36.164.20/sustainability/weee/index.htm
Worth a read, it will probably effect us all in one way or another.
Dave.
Flipper wrote:
😯 For those that haven’t attended a council or AGM for a while, I would like to point out that at least 5 of the current council members are in there mid thirties. I wouldn’t class this is ‘old school’. A lot of fresh blood with new ideas. 😆Indeed, I agree, I was at the recent Council Meeting. This is not my view, just what I get to hear 😉
Flipper wrote:Less of the generalisations please, It is your industry and your future. So get involved
As mentioned, try and get to Peterborough Saturday 18th October. It’ll be worth the effort I believe. 8)
Dave.
To put your minds at rest, F3 means that the machine has not drained all of the water within a particular time scale.
So, either the machine is draining slowly, or as mentioned there may be a fault within the pressure system. Mark has mentioned that the machine is empty when the error code occurs, which would indicate that the fault definitely lies within the pressure system.
Dave.
That’s how I fealt when I read this, AIS have always as far as I was concerned been a fair company to work with, despite the low rates. Which it would now appear are unrealistically low due to ‘management fee syndrome’.
Dave.
Alex wrote: His main concern was the of “The Old School” within the DASA organisation.
That is the general feedback I have been getting as well.
Dave.
Well he’s definitely a Kenwood agent, they are on their site as appointed agents http://www.kenwoodservice.co.uk/agents/ … rshire.htm
Does this match the details ?Dave.
JP wrote:Your all to late already sent an email back to Chris informing him of a number of discrepencies in his minutes and politelty suggested that they be amended before they are issued.
Can I take it then that the minutes we recieved last night by email should never have been sent, or is Chris ignoring your request to ammend them ?
Dave.
kwatt wrote:I am sorry, bad coding by yours truly.
I didn’t want to mention any names 😉
kwatt wrote:Or was that message intended for someone specific? 😉
Hmmmmm, what could he mean 😆
Dave
Flipper wrote:I have been told they will now guarantee payment on fresh powerhouse calls ?
I think I’d like that in writing before I agreed to do any calls on that basis.
Especially with JTM’s record.
Dave
appboy wrote:May be used as a carrot though! 😥
I know what I’d like to do with a carrot to JT 😯
Trouble is knowing the Audi TT driver type person he is, he’d probably come back for more 😉
Dave.
kwatt wrote:It is a great pleasure to see that the website has today passed the 100,000 page views mark
And my eyes are telling me about it 😯
Just past midnight when we passed the landmark 😀 100,000 😀 was it not ?
Dave.
johnmac11 wrote:1 across is a moat
2 down is an Anderson shelter
took me 30 mins to click on to the answers.LOL, Nice One 8)
Dave
For the benifit of those that have already returned the form, do they need to re-send a renamed version ?
Thanks.
Dave.
