Jackal

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 930 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: September 2012 engineers meeting #377055
    Jackal
    Participant

    September 2012 engineers meeting

    Thanx

    Is this open to all engineers or WTA members only?

    Jackal


    Sent from my iPhone 4s using Tapatalk

    in reply to: Raw and Refurbished Washers and Cookers #376038
    Jackal
    Participant

    Raw and Refurbished Washers and Cookers

    Fact

    Neil Duncan Spence sentenced to 15 Months custodial at Norwich Crown Court on 14th June 2012 for £340k VAT Fraud.

    Jackal


    Sent from my iPhone 4s using Tapatalk

    in reply to: Removal Of Adrian Welke #371657
    Jackal
    Participant

    Removal Of Adrian Welke

    Adrian Welke wrote:

    I meet all joining criteria.

    Kind Regards,

    Adrian Welke
    Appliance Care
    Tel: 01656 647000
    http://www.appliancecarewales.co.uk

    Obviously excepting the ones involving honesty, integrity and brining the association into disrepute of course

    Jackal

    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

    Jackal
    Participant

    Letting agency deducting 10{e5d1b7155a01ef1f3b9c9968eaba33524ee81600d00d4be2b4d93ac2e58cec2d}

    Do you do your shopping each week and tell Tescos your deducting 10{e5d1b7155a01ef1f3b9c9968eaba33524ee81600d00d4be2b4d93ac2e58cec2d} and they allow it?

    Think about it and therein you will probably find the answer.

    Jackal

    Sent from my iPhone 4s using Tapatalk

    in reply to: TA Website Alterations #376857
    Jackal
    Participant

    TA Website Alterations

    As bright as an unlit candle but as annoying as my mother in law

    C


    Sent from my iPhone 4s using Tapatalk

    in reply to: TA Website Alterations #376854
    Jackal
    Participant

    TA Website Alterations

    K

    If its in force it should be available to all and sundry. WE have nothing to hide.

    Any applications for membership which are to be declined should be notified in writing to the applicant as soon as possible using the briefest of letters such as

    “Thank you for your recent application.

    After careful consideration we regret your application has not been successful on this occasion. A full refund of the fee paid is currently being processed.

    Should you wish to appeal this decision a formal appeal process is in place, details of which are outlined in our Constitution, which is available from our website.

    Yours


    Whitegoods Trade Association “

    Note it is not signed by a person, Just squiggle an unreadable signature in the space.

    This removes the personal aspect of decision and prevents the us needing to engage in an argument about it.

    If an appeal materialises then it is dealt with in paper format and full but brief and sustinct reasons can be given.

    We are a professional association so we should have no fear about our actions and decisions when we make them.

    If anyone is uncomfortable in declining an application and dealing with any subsequent appeal I would be happy to deal it on behalf of the WTA.

    Regards

    Carl

    Sent from my iPhone 4s using Tapatalk

    in reply to: TA Website Alterations #376852
    Jackal
    Participant

    TA Website Alterations

    K

    Is the new constitution up on the WTA site as once a certain persons application is formally declined he will need to refer to it for the appeal process.

    The new constitution deals fully with applications, declines and appeals so it removes the discussion he will try to enter into.

    C

    Sent from my iPhone 4s using Tapatalk

    in reply to: Removal Of Adrian Welke #371647
    Jackal
    Participant

    Removal Of Adrian Welke

    I am not prepared to be a member of an organisation which allows this individual to be a member for the following reasons:-

    1. He owes the WTA over £900 for a laptop which despite many assurances that payment will be made has failed to materialise. I consider this theft.

    2. His statements prior to being removed previously, belittles the efforts made by everyone else and degrades the organisation he seeks admission too, if we’re all so bad three months ago in his mind, what has changed and I doubt his integrity and ability to behave in a reasonable and constructive manner.

    3. He has for the past three months claimed membership to an organisation who’s requirements require membership of either the WTA or DASA, neither of which he held. I consider this fraudulent.

    4. He has conducted work on gas appliances whilst not registered with Gas Safe. I consider this fraudulent and dangerous.

    5. I have previously discovered he provided unauthorised access to third parties to the admin function if the WTA online system, and I doubt his integrity.

    6. He was previous excluded from the WTA for repeated non payment of his subscription. Has this been paid in full to clear his debt?

    The matter, as always, is the responsibility of the WTA and I will respect the decision the management team make regarding this without further input, but if his membership is authorised, please delete my membership of the WTA and remove all accounts on the UKW relating to me with immediate effect.

    Good luck all and best wishes.

    Jackal


    Sent from my iPhone 4s using Tapatalk

    in reply to: new software for service/stock/data management #324671
    Jackal
    Participant

    new software for service/stock/data management

    Thanks Peter this is very interesting.

    Jackal


    Sent from my iPhone 4s using Tapatalk

    in reply to: H51 on Panasonic NA-148VG3 #376148
    Jackal
    Participant

    H51 on Panasonic NA-148VG3

    H51 is overload detected on motor (machine thinks motor under stress)

    It’s either a motor failure or power board is fried.

    PM me an email address and I can forward the service manual.

    Jackal

    Sent from my iPhone 4s using Tapatalk

    in reply to: Bit of advice RE – COMET #375796
    Jackal
    Participant

    Bit of advice RE – COMET

    Helo hi

    Unfortunately in law you appear to have received money your not entitled to and therefore you have no option but to repay it.

    However as it is there mistake and in view of the amount involved you are entitled to have the detailed explanation of how the mistake came to be, in other words force them to explain how the overpayment is calculated and how if came to be overpaid.

    You should also negotiate a repayment schedule which is manageable day over a six month period.

    Keep the overpayment in a separate ring fenced account whilst the explanation and negotiation takes place.

    Only write to them, never email, text or deal with them by telephone, send all letters by recorded delivery.

    There only way to enforce a recovery of the amount is to obtain a CCJ. It will take them at least six months to risk the court action coming to trial, plus the costs and potential embarrassment of it all should put them off that action if your sort if co operating with them; also should they be stupid enough to try court then your letters will act as a defence to the action. I have seen plenty of Judges reject such claims when the defendant proves they have attempted to be reasonable. County Court Judges don’t like big company Bullys!

    At the end of the day, should it go to court and you loose, you have 28 days to pay up and thus prevent any ccj from being registered so why not push your luck.

    I have helped defend many of these instances and to be honest the majority of times thus occurs for this type of amount is high, most reasonable employers usually end up walking away as the cost of fighting it is too high for them to justify the solicitors bills.

    If it turns tits on you, pm me your email address and I will look at it off forum and guide you from there.

    Most important thing of all, DON’T let it get to you or frighten you in to reacting rashly in to paying up, that’s what there after.

    Best wishes

    Jackal

    Sent from my iPhone 4s using Tapatalk

    in reply to: PABL DW IP21???? #375775
    Jackal
    Participant

    PABL DW IP21????

    Jim hi

    PABL dishwashers were sourced from Baumatic (whom sourced them from Midea), Brandt or direct from Midea.

    I can supply parts for the Baumatic and Midea if available, but not Brandt.

    E4 on PABL (Baumatic & Midea) is usually water in base, anti flood protection activated if I remember correctly.

    However the model code quoted isn’t being recognised in my database against anything PABL related I am afraid, in any version of the numerous PABL companies which have existed.

    Sorry I cannot be more help.

    Regards always

    Jackal

    Sent from my iPhone 4s using Tapatalk

    in reply to: MJH AFTERCARE #374971
    Jackal
    Participant

    MJH AFTERCARE

    Sorry to question the statements on here, but it is a legal requirement under the Companies Act to inform Companies House on the appointment of Liquidators, Administrators, Receivers etc.

    This hasn’t been done according to Companies House as of 30 seconds ago. This begs the question as to whether the statements being made as to their supposed current legal status is in fact true or not?

    Just because someone answering their tel number says they have gone bust doesn’t actually make it so.

    Liquidators, administrators, receivers are all licenced so have to follow strict rules regarding notification and in particular investigating the actions of the company, it’s directors and it’s shareholders. This investigation HAS to be reported to the Secretary of State and it is usually from this report that disqualifications to be a company officer take place.

    From what I see this hasn’t been done so it begs the question, are they really bust or has Julian simply walked away with the money he owes you guys?

    Until someone goes through the motions and forces the insolvency we will never know and he is free to do it time and time again.

    Jackal


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

    in reply to: golocal reactive #365872
    Jackal
    Participant

    golocal reactive

    So if he has sufficient funds to pay up front, why is he not paying the engineers he has shafted already?

    Also with ALL that Comet work he is supposed to be getting, you know the ones Comet don’t know anything about, he should have loads to share around.

    Interesting though, nationally he only owes 32 agents or so he claims, which incidentally is different to the story he gave the High Court Enforcement Officer (High Court Sheriff) last week when he levied on the warrant I had issued.

    He managed to suddenly pay up when faced with that!

    Jackal


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

    in reply to: golocal reactive #365862
    Jackal
    Participant

    Re: golocal reactive

    squadman wrote:

    Jackal was right then.

    When is he ever wrong ?

    Accordingly to Mrs Jackal “All the f***ing time” but lets not go there.

    Sorry guys I did try to warn you what I was doing with this shower. I just hope some people listened.

    Regards

    Jackal

Viewing 15 posts - 481 through 495 (of 930 total)