Home › Forums › General Trade Forum › NAC (ADVERT THREAD: IGNORE IT)
- This topic has 291 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 7 months ago by
admin.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 6, 2013 at 12:54 pm #400756
NationalAppCare
ParticipantRe: NAC (ADVERT THREAD: IGNORE IT)
It’s abundantly clear that the aim here is to belittle NAC and people involved so I shall withdraw from the conversation.
Thankfully, there is a whole world of engineers throughout the UK that do not visit here and I can understand why after reading a few threads. I also note that very few work provider businesses come here to engage with people either. I asked ‘why’ to a colleague yesterday and his blunt reply was along the lines of “Waste of time”. I now clearly understand.
I also understand why other engineers that do work with us and visit these forums do not post in this topic.
No-one at NAC started this thread so you should have expected at some point, some interest from NAC. However I will now take my leave but if any reader would like to contact me directly to clarify anything stated in this thread, then please feel free.
John Cohen.
[float=left:1gwazvtz]
[/float:1gwazvtz]This user account is strongly suspected as being compromised and in use by at least two or more people as several posts have been made from an IP address also in use by another user. We would advise in the strongest terms not to take any information posted by this user at face value or as being factual.The account has limited access, is moderated and has no access to the private messaging system.
December 6, 2013 at 1:04 pm #400757kwatt
KeymasterRe: NAC (ADVERT THREAD: IGNORE IT)
Funnily enough John, before you leave and, I’m glad you’ve decided to at least stop arguing a lost cause…
Who is John Cohen?
There is no trace of you online anywhere in relation to the companies that you say you’ve worked for and none of our contacts have ever heard of you. That includes people that work in those organisations.
All very strange indeed, only adding to the mystery and, it has to be said the suspicions.
Please understand, we haven’t a clue who you are, your’e just and email address and a name on a screen representing a company that has and is getting flack so you started at the bottom. Whatever you may or may not have done before (if you are who you say you are) means Jack Schmitt to us.
Making you a waste of time to us I’m afraid where you choose to make claims or offers that you cannot back up with actual evidence.
But if you spoke to any of the companies that have tried to advertise here or promote franchise then absolutely they would regard this site as a waste of time as I will not allow it to be used or corrupted with their garbage.
Have a nice day.
K.
December 6, 2013 at 3:38 pm #400758iadom
ModeratorRe: NAC (ADVERT THREAD: IGNORE IT)
NAC wrote
Impossible. If you can track IP Addresses then you would have seen that I would have been at various locations while travelling through Birmingham. I had the delight of a very long, delayed and boring train journey yesterday afternoon so I used that opportunity to create an account to reply to various questions asked of National Appliance Care.
It’s the blatant lies that let you down every time.
At 2.22pm yesterday jamieparrie, or whoever was actually using the jamieparrie account posted from an Orange Mobile enabled device.
The post was a complete load of semi literate drivel, most five year olds would have done better.Just two hours later you make five posts from the very same IP on the same Orange mobile enabled device. :rolls:
Your last posts have been made from a BTNET, Wakefield based IP.
December 6, 2013 at 5:32 pm #400759Martin
ParticipantRe: NAC (ADVERT THREAD: IGNORE IT)
NationalAppCare wrote:Hi all.
My name is John Cohen. I am head of Marketing for National Appliance Care.
Above was the opening line to your first post on here John. Your motives then were an attempt to explain the whole point of NAC. And as you’re the “head of marketing” there was no better opportunity than to post here on the UK’s premier white goods site. All we (by that I mean registered trade members) expect from you is openness and honesty. The truth and nothing but the truth. It’s not a courtroom but we are here to judge. To judge the worth of the whole NAC thing. How difficult can that be I wonder?
December 8, 2013 at 10:58 am #400760lee8
ParticipantRe: NAC (ADVERT THREAD: IGNORE IT)
How does NAC assure a repairer that each client will pay for the parts. If l for example charge £1000 for a pump and the client states “go f888k yourself” do l still get £49.00
If so sign me up, getting that for doin nothing seems a great deal, much better than the £20 NAC gets.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
December 8, 2013 at 11:21 am #400761lee8
ParticipantRe: NAC (ADVERT THREAD: IGNORE IT)
I believe also that any WP trying to get work from a brand would need to get KnowHow out of the way first.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
December 8, 2013 at 11:53 am #400762Martin
ParticipantRe: NAC (ADVERT THREAD: IGNORE IT)
lee8 wrote:How does NAC assure a repairer that each client will pay for the parts.
It doesn’t lee8, and leave off with the crude analogies, dragging the topic your level.
December 8, 2013 at 1:06 pm #400763jamieparrie
ParticipantRe: NAC (ADVERT THREAD: IGNORE IT)
hello.i charge the quoted fee even if a appliance is ber.doesnt happen oftern i think maybe 2or3 times last few months.but basicaly yeah its a service charge so they payup.nac are fine though so if one refuses to pay thebill,they contact customer and credit the fee for that job.this happens just once since i started tho so not on oftern ocurance.
jamie[float=left:yzgd4foj]
[/float:yzgd4foj]This user account is strongly suspected as being compromised and in use by at least two or more people as several posts have been made from an IP address also in use by another user. We would advise in the strongest terms not to take any information posted by this user at face value or as being factual.The account has limited access, is moderated and has no access to the private messaging system. In this case due to abuse of those privileges.
December 8, 2013 at 1:48 pm #400764lee8
ParticipantRe: NAC (ADVERT THREAD: IGNORE IT)
Martin wrote:
It doesn’t lee8, and leave off with the crude analogies, dragging the topic your level.
Grow up.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using TapatalkDecember 8, 2013 at 6:33 pm #400765lee8
ParticipantRe: NAC (ADVERT THREAD: IGNORE IT)
jamieparrie wrote:hello.i charge the quoted fee even if a appliance is ber.doesnt happen oftern i think maybe 2or3 times last few months.but basicaly yeah its a service charge so they payup.nac are fine though so if one refuses to pay thebill,they contact customer and credit the fee for that job.this happens just once since i started tho so not on oftern ocurance.
So clients are happy to pay a fee for call out and labour without knowing the final price of the repair and are happy to lose that fee if they reject the repair once parts are added.
Genius.
Send me a form.
Ken l strongly advise you also join NAC, this would make xmas an extremely prosperous new yr.
I’ve removed several bad words as ladies on here maybe offended.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
Sent from my GT-N7000 using TapatalkDecember 8, 2013 at 7:32 pm #400766jamieparrie
ParticipantRe: NAC (ADVERT THREAD: IGNORE IT)
yes lee8.all the jobs we get are customers whos have been told its eiter 49 or 55 or 65 or 75 call out,diagnostic and labour fees plus parts if they needed.the price depends on the appliance types.
so again yes of i go to a customer an the apliance is ber then we charge the call out and labour.but again this dont happen much as we in the buisness to fix things lol
jamie.
oh and to admin i think its stupid that you ad red words to my posts lool[float=left:14vi3xnm]
[/float:14vi3xnm]This user account is strongly suspected as being compromised and in use by at least two or more people as several posts have been made from an IP address also in use by another user. We would advise in the strongest terms not to take any information posted by this user at face value or as being factual.The account has limited access, is moderated and has no access to the private messaging system. In this case due to abuse of those privileges.
December 8, 2013 at 7:39 pm #400767kwatt
KeymasterRe: NAC (ADVERT THREAD: IGNORE IT)
jamieparrie wrote:oh and to admin i think its stupid that you ad red words to my posts lool
And I think it’s stupid that you come on here posting lies as well as lying about who is actually using this account but, there you go eh, laughs all around.
K.
December 8, 2013 at 8:21 pm #400768Martin
ParticipantRe: NAC (ADVERT THREAD: IGNORE IT)
NAC’s own website forum has never been used. Not one single contributor has posted anything on it. Where are their ‘engineers’ ?
December 8, 2013 at 8:45 pm #400769lee8
ParticipantRe: NAC (ADVERT THREAD: IGNORE IT)
I believe their engineers probably want to keep this to themselves. Being able to mark up spares without limit & all with a guarantee of at least £49 is amazing.
The last thing l’d want is someone else under cutting me and getting the call just to keep the client from posting poor comments about NAC all over the net.
For jamie , how can a paying client have an appliance deemed BER ?
As for brands, they happy l’d turn up and charge them 3000{e5d1b7155a01ef1f3b9c9968eaba33524ee81600d00d4be2b4d93ac2e58cec2d} mark up on parts.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
December 8, 2013 at 9:03 pm #400770jamieparrie
ParticipantRe: NAC (ADVERT THREAD: IGNORE IT)
hello lee8 because if i go to a appliance let say a washing machine that need a pcb and the fix comes to 200 pounds,the customer might not want to go ahed with fix so that makes it ber?.and like every person calling a tradesmen out for a fee then that has to be paid.
and hello martin.have they got a forums?.[float=left:1usq2xm4]
[/float:1usq2xm4]This user account is strongly suspected as being compromised and in use by at least two or more people as several posts have been made from an IP address also in use by another user. We would advise in the strongest terms not to take any information posted by this user at face value or as being factual.The account has limited access, is moderated and has no access to the private messaging system. In this case due to abuse of those privileges.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
