W3922 vs ISE10

[cockney steve]

Re: W3922 vs ISE10

I am actually mature for my age.

😆 😆 😆

ROFLMAO!… ah, well, At least you have a sense of humour!

[iadom]

Re: W3922 vs ISE10

One question has puzzled me Adam, did you complete your course at college or did you drop out, seeing as you are now working for a firm of kitchen fitters?

Jim.

[adamhornsby]

Re: W3922 vs ISE10

Working for a kitchen design company, yes (miele kitchens of course, no cheap rubbish involved!), and im going back to do the other half of the course this September.

[hotpnt]

Re: W3922 vs ISE10

so any electrical, mechanical or electronic experience at all??

[iadom]

Re: W3922 vs ISE10

adamhornsby wrote:Working for a kitchen design company

So they don’t actually fit kitchens, they just design them, or are they really kitchen fitters who like 99.9{e5d1b7155a01ef1f3b9c9968eaba33524ee81600d00d4be2b4d93ac2e58cec2d} of kitchen fitting firms do their own designs.

Reminds me of the time I worked on the farm as a youth, used to tell the girls I was an Agricultural technician. 😆

Jim.

[adamhornsby]

Re: W3922 vs ISE10

iadom wrote:

adamhornsby wrote:
Working for a kitchen design company

So they don’t actually fit kitchens, they just design them, or are they really kitchen fitters who like 99.9{e5d1b7155a01ef1f3b9c9968eaba33524ee81600d00d4be2b4d93ac2e58cec2d} of kitchen fitting firms do their own designs.

Reminds me of the time I worked on the farm as a youth, used to tell the girls I was an Agricultural technician. 😆

Jim.
I work with my boss designing them, but she employs fitters

[hotpnt]

Re: W3922 vs ISE10

hope they are good fitters if they are fitting expensive ranges, ie, electrical qualified to part P & 17th ed iee, corgi for the gas side etc etc

[admin]

Re: W3922 vs ISE10

Hi

I work with my boss designing them, but she employs fitters

Case rested..fitters are fitters not engineers,most dont use there head and think going forward,they just follow drawings that are thought out by someone sitting at a computer thinking of how good its going to look rather than the practical or realistic use of the appliances .

Yes I have seen bad kitchen fitters and good ones (good ones are quite often the householder).

Bryan

[adamhornsby]

Re: W3922 vs ISE10

r600a wrote:Hi

I work with my boss designing them, but she employs fitters

Case rested..fitters are fitters not engineers,most dont use there head and think going forward,they just follow drawings that are thought out by someone sitting at a computer thinking of how good its going to look rather than the practical or realistic use of the appliances .

Yes I have seen bad kitchen fitters and good ones (good ones are quite often the householder).

Bryan

You’ve obviously not met my boss or my father. Both do an excellent job.
I’l show my talents, prepare to be impressed. These are what I did for our extension at home, and the smaller one is what I did at work, both done on a cheap cad package which i have mastered…. just in case anyone is interested
http://i260.photobucket.com/albums/ii23 … owview.jpg
http://i260.photobucket.com/albums/ii23 … island.jpg
http://i260.photobucket.com/albums/ii23 … ngarea.jpg

[helo_75]

wow

so you can draw as well as talk bol**ks

your making yourself look a prize tos**r adam, shut up while the goings good

i refer people to adams ramblings on the non faulty miele washer

http://www.ukwhitegoods.co.uk/modules.p … ic&t=35529

this post about sums you up

[kwatt]

Re: W3922 vs ISE10

Adam, I know this is drifting way off topic but, just looking your kitchen design have you ever come across a thing known as the “work triangle” for kitchen design. Do you even know what it is?

I will tell you that most designers don’t, especially on new builds and it leads to a very awkward way of working when you actually use the kitchen. I appreciate it has to look nice and you’ve only got a finite amount of space but I place function way over form when it comes to kitchen design.

It also serves other purposes but I’m intrigued as it appears that your designs have more to do with appearance than function. It’s not me criticising, I’m trying to help you design better.

K.

[adamhornsby]

Re: W3922 vs ISE10

kwatt wrote:Adam, I know this is drifting way off topic but, just looking your kitchen design have you ever come across a thing known as the “work triangle” for kitchen design. Do you even know what it is?

I will tell you that most designers don’t, especially on new builds and it leads to a very awkward way of working when you actually use the kitchen. I appreciate it has to look nice and you’ve only got a finite amount of space but I place function way over form when it comes to kitchen design.

It also serves other purposes but I’m intrigued as it appears that your designs have more to do with appearance than function. It’s not me criticising, I’m trying to help you design better.

K.
Indeed i know of the triangle, but a triangle isnt necessarily a ‘equal’ triangle, but there is one there, more of a skewed triangle, it does work though as everything is one on side that relates to the triangle. thanks though

[helo_75]

and now were retorting to private message insults……..

not somewhere you want to go adam

[kwatt]

Re: W3922 vs ISE10

adamhornsby wrote:Indeed i know of the triangle, but a triangle isnt necessarily a ‘equal’ triangle, but there is one there, more of a skewed triangle, it does work though as everything is one on side that relates to the triangle. thanks though

Indeed, so can I ask why you have a fridge next to an oven, which is asking for trouble, in what looks to be the case in both designs then? You will have issues with door seals there as well as hot air ingress, probably a substantial ice build up in a matter of months as well as a host of other issues over time. Hot next to cold… not a good plan at all.

Also, if you know this, you should know it goes storage>preparation>cooking but in both cases it appears to go storage>cooking>preparation meaning that you’re cutting across the triangle, it’s not skewed in my opinion, it’s way off kilter for cooking in.

Sorry, I have to ask as I cook and see a LOT of bad design which, as I say, looks nice, but isn’t exactly the most practical.

K.

[admin]

kwatt wrote:
No, no difference other than the spin speed and the 1600 is quieter as it has an induction (brushless) motor.

K.

Then the 1600 models on sale now are quieter than my earlier comment may have suggested, although the 1400 one I have seems quiet enough.

Out of interest are there any other advantages over a motor with brushes that they are used in the more expensive models of machine?

I’m guessing they will last longer as there are no brushes to wear out although I have no idea how long a standard motor should last? Hopefully 20 years give or take if the Swedes are to be believed ❓ 😯

Well nearly 1 down and 19 to go and no call out yet 😆

Gary

[Author]

Posts