Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Goatboy
ParticipantRe: Dyson DC05 Motorhead
The part should be fit by a qualified engineer for safety reasons.
I can’t be specific on fitting, again for safety reasons. 🙁
Goatboy
ParticipantRe: Dyson DC05 Motorhead
jagmad wrote:Would appreciate copy of wiring diagram if possible so I can trace the circuit.
Sorry, I can’t do that.
What was the original problem?
If it was no motor action from that motorhead, it could be a module problem (from past expierience). These are notoriously awkward, and I’d recommend professional help from your local Dyson specialist.
Goatboy
ParticipantRe: Dyson DC05 Motorhead
I’m pretty sure the first way is correct.
But the manufacteurs have an annoying habit of changing the colours of the wires.
I have a wiring diagram, but it’s in black + white. 🙁
Always unplug the vac first. :plug:
August 29, 2005 at 12:14 pm in reply to: DYSON DC04 Dual CycloneHOOVER NOt PICKING UP,lacks suction #146080Goatboy
ParticipantRe: DYSON DC04 Dual CycloneHOOVER NOt PICKING UP,lacks sucti
It depends what colour the Dyson is.
The silver/Lime one (slime) is a clutchless model which is prone to belts snapping. It’s easily acessible with a 2p coin.
The silver/yellow one has a clutch. The brushroll will only rotate, once the head has been lowered. But on this model, I get that complaint alot when people have accidently disengaged the clutch.
Goatboy
ParticipantRe: UK Whitegoods Meeting 5
That got me thinking. Have you booked me a double?
I’ll only need a single if that helps. Mrs Goat aint coming, and I don’t think I’ll be getting lucky.
August 26, 2005 at 4:33 pm in reply to: A good lightweight vacuum cleaner for my mother (who is 70 ) #145240Goatboy
ParticipantRe: A good lightweight vacume cleaner for my mother (who is
nerdette wrote:…so they tend to make a good second cleaner.
Exactly! That’s how I sell those electronic sweepers. They won’t pick up the dust-mites lurking deep in the carpet, but for everyday cleaning (spills, or chasing around kids and pets) they are quick and easy.
There is a little vacuum made by Home tek, called the ‘light + easy’. It comes with bag, suction and sweeping power, but (IMO) it’s a little too tacky (plastic fan).
Goatboy
ParticipantRe: Vacuum Cleaner
Anything will be lighter than a kirby. 🙄
As a good bagged machine (if your not as rich as Dell, and can’t afford an Oreck) I recommend the Panasonic. It’s a nice, light, reliable design, that hasn’t changed for the last 20ish years. All the bags are the same for the Panasonic upright range too, making finding them very easy. The only problem with Panasonic (IMHO) is that after-sales service sucks, so don’t break it.
Latest one – MCE3001 – £70-£80ish.
If you are as rich as Dell, buy the Oreck!
Unless you want a bagless!!!! Thats a whole new essay.
Goatboy
ParticipantRe: Strings + Codes
Sweet!
I got it right first time. 😉
Thank you
August 25, 2005 at 9:41 am in reply to: A good lightweight vacuum cleaner for my mother (who is 70 ) #145238Goatboy
ParticipantRe: A good lightweight vacume cleaner for my mother (who is
I’m a big fan of the G-tech. It’s not a vacuum, but it works as a very powerful sweeper. Hence, the vacuum only comes out once a week, because most spills and general mess can be cleaned up by the G-tech.
Check it out here – http://www.greytechnology.com/
Then buy one here – Shop@ – Gtech
Goatboy
ParticipantRe: Graded appliance
Dave_Conway wrote:Hotmerldesiton
😆 😆 😆
I like ‘Horloni’ myself.
Goatboy
ParticipantRe: Refurbishers
That probably depends on whether you want some money for it or not.
And make, model and problem would help too. 😉
Goatboy
ParticipantRe: Philco RWM1041
Two should be arriving tomorrow, thank you.
But if not, I’ll be PM’ing you.
ps. twas a fantastic machine. twas the last machine I sold with an induction motor. (and a stainless steel tub). 😉
Goatboy
ParticipantRe: Philco RWM1041
Parts-Sambles claim to have some. 😀
I had to order over the phone, as the website is still intorrable.
Cheers Dave. I owe you a pint for that (and all the others).
See you in Sibson.
Goatboy
ParticipantRe: Guess who’s back.
Goatboy wrote:…for comedy’s sake?
Sorry Martin. That’s not funny.
It’s more like reading a Shakespearian tradegy.
Goatboy
ParticipantRe: Guess who’s back.
Is it me that’s stupid, or Martin that deleted it?
I can’t find this thread.
Any chance of a link?
…for comedy’s sake?
-
AuthorPosts
